Welcome to Robot Weld Solutions and Weld Tips.
If you are a robot programmer, please remember, it helps in this confused industry to have thick skin and a sense of humour.
Japan good electronics,
lousy electronic weld equipment.
FOR FOUR DECADES, THE LACK OF AVAILABLE INDUSTRIAL ARGON MIG GAS MIXES AND THE LACK OF MIG WELD PROCESS CONTROL EXPERTISE, WERE TWO REASONS WHY MOST MAJOR JAPANESE COMPANIES SUCH AS TOYOTA AND HONDA MADE TERRIBLE QUALITY MIG WELDS. THEN ALONG CAME THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUT ELECTRONICS INTO THE JAPANESE WELD QUIPMENT AND THAT RESULTED IN THE TERRIBLE JAPANESE MIG EQUIPMENT, WHCH WE HAVE SEEN IN MANY USA ROBOT CELLS:
Japan is a country that after the second world war has had few industrial gas plants. Argon MIG gas mixes in Japan have been a rarity and when available were and still are very costly. In the weld industry, for decades Japan had utilized mostly straight CO2 gas for it's MIG welds, and the weld result was a globular, erratic weld transfer that would make any weld professional cringe.
In the last four decades, the majority of North American and European weld shops were caught up buying into the MIG gas mix con game. In contrast, in this time period Japananese weld shops rarely experience quality MIG Spray Transfer welds, while they struggled with CO2.
For decades Japanese auto plants had not been able to produce optimum manual or automated quality MIG welds and grinding was considered part of the process requirement to make welds. In the eigties and nineties as Japanese auto plants increased in the USA, the Japanese delivered their own robots with the MIG weld equipment that was made in Japan. It's important for weld personnel to keep in mind that with the robot cells you worked withm if you used Japanese Robots and Japanese MIG equipment from the 1980s to 2000 you were using weld equipment that was very inferior to the weld equipment sold by USA companies such as Miller or Hobart and European MIG equipment from ESAB.
In 2015, the Japanese MIG equipment is better than it's earlier attempt at making MIG equipment, and if a company insists on using Pulsed MIG, the Asian built pulsed equipment made by OTC Daihen is typically more cost effective with superior arc characteristics to
the North American Pulsed MIG equipment.
Note. The Pulsed MIG process is not required for most manual steel MIG welds and offers minimal weld benefits. As pulsed equipment has more electronics than CV equipmentm the pulsed units lend themselves to having a built in interface to communicate with the robots. These pulsed units offer pulsed and regular spray and short circuit modes, however in general, these weld modes were inferior to the same modes attainable from most 250 - 400 amp CV units.
The bottom line, in contrast to pulsed MIG equipment, optimum MIG manual or automated weld quality and productivity on steel welds can be attained with lower cost, more durable, easier to use CV MIG equipment utilizing the traditional Short Circuit and Spray Transfer modes, and it does not matter if that CV MIG equipment was purchased in 1960 or purchased in 2015.
The wise robot technician simply considers the pulsed mode as just another available mode of weld tranfer, and is aware of when to use it and when not to use it.
The global lack of MIG weld process control expertise has always effected MIG weld equipment and consumable selection, and also the weld process logic that has been presented in MIG weld equipment and robot weld program software.
ROBOTS AND WELD EQUIPMENT
BEFORE PURCHASING THAT ROBOT....
Those small to medium weld volume shops that are looking to purchase and introduce robots to MIG weld their steel and stainless applications, should give consideration to the following;
 When you examine each robot manufacture's product don't get caught up with the robot bells and whistles and fancy electronic pulsed MIG power source with it's glossy page weld benefit claims and ridiculous pulsed variations with 1 billion wave forms. As I have done in the evaluation of pulsed MIG over three decades, today in 2013, I see no real world weld benefits from the pulsed MIG process for most steel and alloy steels welds.
 When an integrator or a company that makes robots advises an organization to use pulsed MIG for a steel or alloy steel application, remember pulsed MIG is simply another available weld transfer mode thats typically not necessary for most steel welds. The reality is the pulsed MIG mode will produce inferior weld fusion and inferior arc stability than the traditional spray transfer mode that's been available from the lower cost MIG equipment in use since the 1950s.
 The complex electronics required in the pulsed MIG equipment offer minimal weld quality - productivity benefits for steel weld, however these electronics make for costly MIG equipment purchase and this equipment will produce durability and maintenance concerns.
 Pulsed MIG has never achieved the weld deposition rate potential and the weld speeds that have been attained by the MIG spray mode.
 In comparing robots from different robot manufacturers, companies should examine the simplicity and length of time required with the robot to program a common part and especially the time required to make weld changes to different welds. For decades Japanese robots have been much slower to program than the ABB Swedish robots. If you are not a believer ABB can quickly demonstrate this.
 In comparing robots, examine the ease in which the MIG wire feed, voltage or pulsed parameter changes are made and how these important parameter are viewed and monitored.
 In comparing robots, examine the logic layout of the welding program soft ware as this feature can be both frustrating and time consuming especially when the robot is down.
 Examine the calibration accuracy between the robot pendant and power source weld data, Note most are not calibrated correctly.
 In comparing robots, examine the robot's automated TCP capability and repeatability.
 Examine the ease or complexity of making touch sense and through the arc robot tracking changes. Also carefully examine how effective and consistent these valuable features are.
 Examine the accuracy and repeatability of the robot with the positioner utilized.
 Examine the complexity of programming the robot to work with secondary equipment such as the positioner and torch cleaning stations.
 Examine the robot instruction literature, the technical support, the training available and service capability. Most important, figure out during your initial discussions with the integrator or robot company, who's' supplying the most bovine faecal matter.
 For those low to moderate volume, difficult to weld parts with a few small welds, it's important to always remember, that a blind robot with limited dexterity can never produce the weld productivity or quality that a manual welder can produce.
 Never purchase a robot without a guarantee in the purchase contract that stipulates the robot will produce four hours worth of weld production meeting the production quantity requirements with no down time and no more than 2% weld rework.
Assume no one in the weld shop is an expert on robot MIG best weld practices and robot MIG weld process controls, and then think of the insanity in spending all that money on the costly robot - weld equipment, and yet this company has not considered spending a few dollars on the MIG weld process control training that can optimize the robot weld quality and productivity..
After three decades of never ending robot weld issues, it's no good looking to the auto industry to lead the way with robot good weld practices and process controls.
Robots for Job shops vesus Mfg. shops,
THE ROBOT YOU MAY BE CONSIDERING TO PURCHASE MAY WORK WELL IN AN AUTO - TRUCK PLANT. IN THESE PLANTS PERSONNEL ARE WORKING WITH ROBOTS WHERE;
 THEY RARELY CHANGE THE WELD PROGRAMS FOR DIFFERENT PARTS,
 THE POOR AND INCONSISTENT ROBOT WELD QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY IS ADDRESSED BY ROBOT PERSONNEL WHO FREQUENTLY PLAY AROUND WITH THE WELD DATA,
 THEY ADD MANUAL WORKERS TO THE END OF THE ROBOT LINE TO FIX THE EXTENSIVE WELD REWORK REQUIRED.
HOWEVER THIESE SAME ROBOTS MAY NOT MAKE THE GRADE IN A WELD JOB SHOPTHAT'S SERIOUS ABOUT WELD QUALITY CONSISTENCY, WELD REPEATABILITY, EASYAND FAST ROBOT PROGRAMMING CAPABILITY WITH A WIDE VARIETY OF WELD APPLICATIONS..
IF YOU WANT A GREAT COMPARISON OF CONFUSION VERSUS ROBOT WELD LOGIC, COMPARE THE SOFTWARE = HARDWARE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A JAPANESE PANASONIC OR MOTOMAN ROBOT, AND THE MORE LOGICAL SWEDISH SOFTWARE - HARDWARE USED IN ABB ROBOTS.
BY THE WAY, ON APPLICATIONS WITH A LARGE AMOUNT OF WELDS, I BELIEVE THAT IN CONTRAST TO JAPANESE ROBOTS THAT IT
CAN TAKE 30 TO 50% LESS TIME TO PROGRAM THOSE WELDS WITH AN ABB ROBOT.
TO REVIEW THE IMPORTANT ABOVE JOB SHOP CONSIDERATIONS, SIMPLY SEND YOUR PARTS TO COMPANIES THAT SUPPLY THE ROBOTS AND LET THEM GIVE YOU THE PROGRAMMING AND WELD RESULTS IN A VIDEO.
With robots, the MIG weld quality & productivity opportunities are only limited by a manager's - engineer's weld process control knowledge.
MANY COMPANIES WILL SPEND $100,000 - $500,000 ON THE ROBOT CELLS, THEN SPEND $15,000 ON THE MIG EQUIPMENT USED IN EACH CELL, YET THE COMPANIES TOO OFTEN FAIL TO RECOGNIZE THAT THEIR EMPLOYEES WHO CONTROLLED THE ROBOT EQUIPMENT LACKED THE ROBOT MIG WELD BEST PRACTICE & PROCESS CONTROL EXPERTISE, THAT WAS NECESSARY TO PRODUCE THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE ROBOT WELD QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY, AND IT ONLY COST $500.
ANY OF THE FOLLOWING 15 REASONS WOULD INDICATE THAT A COMPANY LACKS MIG WELD PROCESS CONTROLS AND BEST WELD PRACTICE EXPERTISE.
 If the company has robot weld REWORK thats more than 2% of the parts produced dailt.
 If the robot cells have a robot DOWNTIME per shift, of more than 15 minutes per-robot.
 If the company is using unnecessarily cost weld CONSUMABLES such as gas shielded Flux Cored or Metal Cored wires for welding clean carbon steels < 3/8 in the flat & horizontal welding positions.
 If the company utilize any three part GAS MIXES which are unnecessary for all MIG welding carbon steels or thin gage stainless.
 If the company welds carbon steels and uses MIG gas mixes that contain OXYGEN.
 If the company purchase it' s primary weld supplies from more than one supplier.
 If the purchasing manager is involved in the selection of your weld consumables.
 If the person who is responsible for the robot weld changes works in the MAINTENANCE department.
 If the company allows robot operators or anyone other than the programmer to make welding parameter changes to the robot program.
 If the changes made to the robot welds are not immediately verified through macro samples,
 If there is no pre-weld qualification, weld parameter and best weld manufacturing practices and instructions posted on the walls of the robot cells.
 If the company provides no method to verify the robot weld amps - volts and the wire feed for each weld with that recommended on the part weld map charts that should be supposed to be posted on the out side of the robot cell for easy verification,
 If the manual welders doing the robot weld repairs or simply providing manual welds, use a whipping, skipping or weave actions with their MIG guns.
 If the company uses the pulsed MIG mode and does not fully understand the implications of each pulsed parameter adjustment or the real differences between pulsed - SC and Spray.
 If know one in the company is aware of the real costs of the welds per part.
ALL OF THE ABOVE AND MUCH MORE ARE COVERED IN MY TRAINING PROGRAMS
BETTER THAN TIG.
THE ROBOT TIP - TIG APPLICATION:
This weld report deals with robot TIG welding issues that were occurring on one of the big three cars. The parts required approx. 15 precise small welds and the the parts weld seams were later |brazed. The TIG welds were made with a Fanuc Arc Mate 100 robot, and a Lincoln 350 amp "pulsed" square wave power source. The weld issues at this tier one part supplier were extensive. For more than a year they had struggled to attain a production rate of only 40% of what they desired. The tack welds were frequently missing. Arc starts issues were extensive, and the tack welds would leak. After I rectified the problem, I wrote the following report.
If you want the highest TIG weld quality and productivity attainable with eith manual or robot welds, the regular TIG process is a poor choice, you should instead be looking at the above process that I and my buisness partner bought to North America. This unique process is called TIP TIG, and it's weld quality and productivity potential is far superior than TIG - Cold Wire - Hot Wire TIG. Tip Tig also dramatically reduces the typical TIG arc length sensitivity concerns which is especially a concern with TIG robot welds. Check out Tip Tig at www.tiptigusa.com. Ask for Tom or Nick and tell them Ed sends his regards.
"Robots and Programmer Weld
Process Control Expertise".
A question from an HR manager at a manufacturing facility that utilizes MIG welding robots
Ed. What type of "MIG Weld Process Control Expertise" should we expect when we hire a new robot programmer who will be in charge of our MIG welding robots?
Answer. Your anticipations in 2015 to hire a person with robot MIG weld process controls - best practices expertise needs to be very low as less than 1 in 50 persons who program MIG robots for a living will have the necessary expertise. It would be beneficial if the robot programmer was able to do the following.
Lets say the weld application is a Robot MIG welded common, carbon steel, automotive part. The parts welded are 2 to 2.5 mm thick with gaps 1 - 2 mm. Most of the gage welds are fillet welds. The programmer is informed that the last time your company welded similar parts, weld burn-through issues were prevalent. With this in mind the programmer should know without "playing around" to instantly set all the optimum robot weld parameters, wire feed, amps, volts travel speeds and be able to provide the best practice solutions necessary to rectify the weld issues. A good robot programmer should be able to justify and explain the benefits of the weld transfer mode, the weld gas and the weld wire size selected, and the programmer should be able to train the cell operators to recognize arc sounds that indicate weld faults.
A robot programmer should have the capability without playing around and without"reference to a weld text book to instantly;
 Provide the most logical weld process and mode of weld transfer, short circuit, spray or pulsed and be aware of the optimum complete parameter working ranges for the wire size utilized.
 Provide if using pulsed, expertise on the wide variety of pulsed parameter adjustments.
 Provide the maximum robot weld travel speeds for each weld.
 Provide weld voltages for each weld that will minimize weld spatter.
 Be aware of how to minimize the effects of the weld heat on the part and how to prevent weld burn through.
 Provide the optimum robot weld start / stop data.
 Be aware of the robot MIG gun technique which can effect the arcs and welds.
 Provide weld data that compensates for gaps or part alignment discrepancies.
 Provide weld data that ensures consistent weld fusion.
 Be aware of the weld deposition rates that can be attained and their influence on robot weld travel rates and the weld cost,
 Be able to educate the fixture manufacturers and designers of welded parts on how to design for good weld ability
Be able to answer my MIG weld questions.
A SMALL PRICE FOR KNOWLEGE: To train your robot personnel with all of the above data will cost your organization approx. $500 and you will find it my manual or robot process control training resources.
How many companies could relate to the following?
The robot parts have unacceptable "weld gaps". Weld gaps outside the design criteria simply result from managers and engineers that don't know how to do their job.
Weld gaps are the number one problem for "robot" MIG welds. Managers, designers and engineers frequently forget that manual MIG welders typically will utilize manual techniques, dexterity and skills to compensate for their weld gap variations.
With the blind, dumb robots working with weld gaps that were not on the original parts, it takes an understanding of MIG weld process controls, an understanding of best weld practice for the weld mode used and for the application, and it also takes sophisticated robot programming, and sometimes complex joint sensing controls to provide solutions to those variable an inconsistent weld gaps.
It's a fact that in most automotive - truck plants, that too many weld part dimension tolerances are not in accordance with the part design tolerances. I believe that acceptable, maximum, dimensional weld gap tolerances for optimum, gage (<2.5 mm) MIG robot welds would typically be 0.060m (1.6mm). This dimension is acceptable even for thin gage metals up to 0.060. With very thin gage parts that are less < 0.060, the weld gaps should be no larger than the gage thickness.
In contrast for fillet welds on parts > 3mm, there should be no reason that the gaps should be no more than 0.020 - 0.030 as lack of side wall fusion is readilly attained. As most designers of welded parts have no interst in the weld process used on ther parts you will find that real world weld dimensional weld gap tolerance are rarely known by the designers.
To compensate for the common oversize weld gaps on the thin parts, the automotive manual welder who rarely touches their power source controls, develops "reactive welding skills." The welder can increase the welding wire stick-out to compensate with a weld current reduction. In contrast the robot requires programming that utilizes logical best weld practices and techniques, or uses different weld parameters and weld schedules to compensate for the gaps. This subject covered here.
You will frequently see "long MIG Wire Stick Outs over one inch" ( > 25 mm) used in automotive - truck plants and where high deposition welds are required.
Manual MIG welders welding thin exhaust parts with excess gaps will often utilize a long MIG wire stick out in the range of one to three inches (25 to 75 mm). The reality is that any company that allows manual MIG welders to weld on gage parts with more than >25 mm wire stick out, this is a company waiting to be sued for poor weld quality and poor quality parts.
The first practical solution to welding gaps is place a little focus on providing training for manufacturing engineers and supervisors so they can build the stamped welded parts in accordance with the part design dimension tolerances, then provide the MIG process control training program so the issues are dealt with in a professional manner..
What width should lap
slot welds be on gage parts?
Note the poor design slot dimensions of the these car seat, robot slot MIG welds. These slot are simply "too wide" and a slight issue with the robot TCP or wire helix problem, and the weld will miss or burn the slot edge. Also the short weld lengths typically produce erratic, poor quality weld results..
Note the weld differences thoe the same robot weld data was used. The inconsistencies in short weld lengths is common with electronic pulsed MIG equipment.
Any slot wider than 2.5 mm on gauge parts will reduce weld productivity (larger weld sizes = slower weld speeds), increase weld burn through potential and with a slight movement of the robot TCP could reduce the weld strength.
Design errors such as this are too common and an indication that the designer of these parts did not understand the MIG process.
My advice would be to keep the slots at a maximum width of 2 - 2. 5 mm. With my slots no robot weld weaves would be required and the welds which should be around 3 - 4 mm in width will connect to both sides of the slot resuling in a stronger weld.
Note with any robot MIG weld lengths less than 3/4 (<18 mm), it would be difficult to define the weld quality that can consistently be attained. The reason for the short weld length concerns is the robot in a very short weld cycle time of typically less than 5 seconds will have to communicate three sets of
The data required for optimum control of all gage welds is attainable from my weld process controls - best weld practice programs.
WELD PROCESS CHOICES FOR SHORT WELDS: To optimize short weld lengths, avoid weld burn through on common 1.2 to 2.5 mm gauge parts, and optimize the robot weld productivity, the programmer could utilize high short circuit parameters, moderate pulsed parameters or on the thicker gage parts low spray transfer parameters. If as a weld programmer you look at the above common part, and you don't know the optimum weld parameters for each of the mentioned weld transfer modes it's time to examine your expertise and your value to your organization.
|For more than two decades, the USA had a short supply of good robot welding fixture builders. And in 2014 there are few builders that understand the MIG process that welds parts on their fixtures.
How many robot fixtures have you seen which do not allow optimum MIG gun access or optimum MIG gun angles?
How many fixtures have you seen that have clamps that don't hold the parts with sufficient rigidity, or the clamps are too difficult to open?
How many fixtures have you seen that are sensitive to weld spatter and need rework after being in operation for a few days?
How many fixtures have numerous manual operated clamps when a simple pneumatic control would open all?
For thin gage welds, you could reduce those weld burn through issues, if the fixture designer would think "heat sink" and add highly conductive alloys to the clamps and fixture in the weld vicinity. Weld part designers should communicate with fixture designers and both these individuals should communicate with the robot programmer.
A common management influenced issue in many manufacturing plants that have purchased MIG robots is "ineffective communication between all the parties involved in the robot weld projects"
Panasonic Robot Concerns.
For six weeks the Panasonic robot team could not get their
ROBOTS TO PRODUCE TWO SIMPLE EXHAUST WELDS.
For me, it was another one of those annoying Japanese, Panasonic robot applications. Thanks to the Panasonic engineers, and their obvious lack of understanding simple weld application requirements, we had another simple weld application made complex for the robot end user.
After six weeks, the Panasonic engineers and Panasonic robot integrator could not get their robot to consistently place two small controlled welds, 15 mm in length. The welds were made on a carbon steel rod to a thin gage galvanealed part exhaust bracket. The exhaust hanger bracket was poorly designed by engineers at Honda however was weldable. The Panasonic robot personnel had given up on the project and left the plant and the part supplier had five days left before production was supposed begin. For the rest of the story click here.
HOW FAST OR HOW SLOW SHOULD THAT WELDING ROBOT GO?
Most robots for two decades have been under utilized, and from a weld speed perpective they rarely weld at their weld speed potential. In contrast many other robots are welding at speed which are too fast producing welds with innsufficient weld fusion.
The robot weld speeds can be influenced by;
[a] the wire size or gas selected,
[b] the shape of the part, the part thickness, or the part surface,
[c] the parameters or weld mode selected are not optimum,
[d] using pulsed when they should be using spray.
[e] using short circuit or globular, when they should be using pulsed or spray,
[f] perhaps its the fixture design, the part design, the joint type, part thickness or ridiculous gaps,
[g] maybe the weld size could be reduced.
In my MIG and Flux Cored Weld Process Control self teaching - training resources you will find all the information required for optimum robot weld speeds for all your applications. In my management book I provide unique research infomation that i carried out, that allows robot weld speeds in the 40 - 80 inch/min range.
For two plus decades, I had to reslove numerous robot weld
issues created from the poor Motoman MIG equipment.
The following is an E mail sent to me March 2001. At the persons request, I have deleted his and his companies names.
Ed, we are on our 4th generation of Motoman robots, and I didn't think they could get any worse, however I was wrong.
I simply would not recommend the new UP/XRC Motoman robots to anyone. We have had nothing but problems with them.
Motoman has a real problem with the encoders in their motors, and we have replaced everyone at least once. In addition, I have a servo pack or motor go out on an average of once per week. They are also having wire harness problems with the insulation prematurely wearing out. I have had to replace four so far, and we have only been running since August. We have also had to replace 13 boards in the main processor. They are saying that the Panasonic power sources are creating noise in the unit and taking out the boards, but we are not really buying it and neither is Panasonic. Now, let's compare this to our Canadian facility which uses mostly Fanuc on the same lines designed to produce the same product. I spoke with their technical manager last week and he has not had any warranty claims since startup. If you total up what would have been my repair expense, if the robots were not under warranty, I would have spent in excess of $175,000.00.
2003. Motoman also produced a sad excuse for a weld power source to be used with it's robots.
Notes from Ed: From 1985 to at least 2000, the majority of the global pulsed MIG equipment produced did not have the electronics necessary to provide controlled pulsed MIG transfer and with common steel and alloy steel welds this equipment often caused more weld quality = productivity - down time issues than it resolved. Unfortunately the weld equipment manufacturers forgot to tell the welding industry this simple fact. For more info evidence link here.
If you company used Motoman robots, it's unfortunate that you may have purchased the MotoArc 350 MIG weld equipment. If you were welding thin gauge steel parts with this power source and you wanted poor to mediocre, inconsistent, globular type short circuit welds, you purchased the right equipment.
This should never have been
a MIG power source.
If you wanted to produce poor to mediocre, inconsistent, globular type short circuit welds, purchase the above Motoman MIG power souce.
Erratic Volt - Amp with optimum weld settings.
FEW WELD SHOPS RECOGNIZED THAT FROM THE 1985 TO 2005, THE ELECTRONICS IN MOST THE PULSED EQUIPMENT COULD NOT MEET THE DEMANDS TO CREATE CONSISTENT, STABLE PULSED WELD TRANSFER.
IF MANAGEMENT DOES NOT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY AND OWNERSHIP OF THEIR ROBOTS AND WELD EQUIPMENT, THEY SHOULD EXPECT WELD QUALITY - PRODUCTIVITY ISSUES.
Your company purchased a costly robot cell, yet because those that managed the robot purchase did not stipulate the correct questions on the PO, the robot integrator did not apply the appropriate tests to prove that the robot could consistently produce, optimum weld quality - productivity. Or perhaps your company did stipulate the correct questions on the PO and the robot integrator was simply incapable of the task.
From lack of essential calibration issues, to poor arc command response times and erratic poor performing MIG weld transfer modes, for more than two decades the major robot manufacturers like Motoman - Panasonic - Fanuc - Cloos and ABB selected MIG welding equipment that was the root cause of many of the global robot weld quality and productivity issues that were common throughout the weld industry. However the good news for the robot and weld equipment manufacturers, was thanks to the general customer MIG weld process ignorance which was especially common in auto - truck plants, few company managers using the poor performing weld equipment recognized the real root causes of many of their weld issues. Therefore few managers or company owners took legal actions against the robot and weld equipment suppliers for their weld quality cost issues and production losses. The common robot weld problems I had to deal with;
 Poor power source characteristics.
 Slow power source to robot communication.
 Poor weld parameters selected.
 Poor choice of consumables.
 Poor robot / weld equipment calibration.
 No best practices or process controls.
 Lack of weld process expertise by all involved.
Weld quality and productivity responsibility starts in the front office.
When I visit a plant I work with the robot programmer. After a quick assessment of the weld issues, I would then make the robot weld program changes necessary to compensate for the parts, weld or robot equipment inadequacies. My process changes always improved the weld quality and increased the weld production. After I create the new weld programs and check the welds, I then provide the process control training. As managers and engineers are supposed to be responsible (few are), I insist that all
management, engineers and supervision involved with the welds take part in the training.
When making robot changes, its frustrating to see with specific robots how slow those program changes are being made especially with Japanese robots. Keep in mind, I have worked with every possible global robot type. If you are a "job shop making frequent new robot weld programs" I firmly believe that the ABB robots thanks to the joy stick control and logical Swedish weld soft ware, will require with parts that have many welds, typically 30 to 60% less robot programming times
EVEN ONE OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST ENGINEERING COMPANIES ABB,
AND ESAB A GLOBAL WELD EQUIP MANUFACTURER DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING.
As some of you are aware I was the North American weld manager at ABB robots. While I had much admiration for their robots ABB also had issue with the MIG weld equipment it utilized. ABB got together with ESAB to integrate an Erratic MIG weld power source into the ABB controls. The ESAB equipment marriage would result in the first robot system produced in which the weld power source and robot control would become a single unit. When the ESAB / ABB robot controls arrived in North America in late 1990's, I was responsible for testing the weld equipment and found numerous major weld issues with the ESAB equipment. The ESAB power sources had unsuitable slope dynamics for most MIG welds and irrespective of the optimum weld data used, the results were unstable, inconsistent, poor quality welds especially on parts > 3 mm. Even though the power source was built into the robot control, the weld parameter change response time was too slow dramatically impacting the control of weld starts / ends. The bottom line was the power sources sold by ESAB for the ABB robots was better suited to manual stick welding than for optimum robot MIG welds. The sales personnel at ABB could readily see the ESAB weld issues in the test lab. My blunt advice to the salesmen " if you want to get and keep your robot business, recommend the robots with Miller Delta Weld Equipment". ABB sold the units with the poor ESAB weld equipment to the USA industry and other users knowing the power sources were substandard.
WHY DIDN'T THE GLOBAL WELD SHOP CUSTOMERS COMPLAIN
ABOUT THE ROBOTS AND MIG WELD EQUIPMENT?
The majority of the ABB / ESAB weld power source units were typically sold in the auto plants that had little understanding of the weld process requirements for optimum MIG weld quality / productivity. Remember these were the companies that are used to and have through ignorance always lived with both manual and robot MIG weld quality - productivity issues. And lets face it, managers, engineers and supervisors who lack MIG process control expertise will think it's natural for their weld personnel to play around with the robots and MIG weld data. When you get a chance, visit the MIG equipment sections of this site to read about the sub standard performance of pulsed MIG weld equipment from 1980 to 2005. It's 2013 and while electronic advances are making vast improvements in PULSED MIG equipment performance, there is still little justification for this costly, difficult to maintain equipment and I still weekly see many of the same old problems.
More ABB Robot - ESAB
Arcitec MIG Power Source Issues.
Poor Robot MIG Welds on Ford 6061 Aluminium Car Seats.
During 2000, I was requested by an engineer at VAW a tier one supplier, to evaluate the weld performance of their ABB robots and ESAB Arcitec weld equipment. This plant produces extruded aluminium parts. The aluminium welded car seats were for manufactured for Ford. The car seats and parts required small welds which were made on thin gage 6061 aluminium. Since the installation of the robot cells, continuous production of optimum weld quality parts has been impossible as a result of the weld issues documented in the following report. The weld reject rates averaged sixty percent and the robot down time per hour averaged 20 to 30 minutes. To see the rest of the ESAB Arcitec story, click here.
SOLUTION TO A COMMON ROBOT MIG PROBLEM.
"INCONSISTENT ARC STARTS"
Info like this in Ed's Robot Training Program..
Weld Question: Ed, we frequently have poor robot arc starts on our MIG spray transfer, carbon steel or stainless weld applications. Often the arc does not initiate. We weld carbon steel parts 3 to 5 mm thick. The typical fillet weld size is 3/16, (5mm). For the 3/16 fillets we use an 0.045 (1.2mm) wire set at 450 in./min. The weld travel rates vary from 40 to 60 in./min. The gas used is an argon - 5% oxygen gas mix and the weld / start volts vary from 24 to 25 volts.
Answer. The part thickness you weld and the 3/16 fillet weld size requirement allows " higher than normal manual weld travel rates". Weld speed affects the weld voltage used, the faster the speed the lower the weld volts. Two things here are effecting your weld start issues. The argon - oxy gas used requires" lower weld voltages" than the more common argon 10 - 20% C02 mixes. As the fast weld speeds require "lower weld voltages" and the gas requires lower weld volts "therefore the weld voltage you are using is lower than normal for the high wire feed rate delivered".
For starting the arc with the high wire feed used with the 045 wire, you typically would require 28 - 30 volts. Examine your other options below.
Robot Arc Start Solution: Just because you are welding with a high wire feed rate for the weld does not mean you have to use a high wire feed rate at the weld arc start. You could reduce the 0.045 wire feed rate at the arc start to a low spray rate of 370 ipm instead of the 450 ipm. This would require a lower start voltage of 26 to 28 volts. This action not only improves arc starts, it will reduce wire burn back potential and stop over size welds at the start.
Robot Arc Start Solution: For a spray weld ensure the arc delay time is sufficient for the arc ignition. Typically 0.2 to 0.4 seconds. Remember robot micro times are rarely accurate, if you don't hear your arc start data the time you selected is typically not effective.
Robot Arc Start Solution: The larger the weld the longer the arc ignition delay time. The smaller the weld the shorter the ignition time. On gage applications I rarely use ignition delay times
Robot Arc Start Solution: Ensure the pre-flow gas time is sufficient. Without gas ionization arcs don't exist
Robot Arc Start Solution: If you don't want to build up a glob on the end of your weld wire, remember that good arc start data requires good end weld data. Optimum weld end data ensures the completed weld wire stick out is minimum and there is no ball of weld on the wire tip.
Note: In these pages ee are touching a miniscule amount of the process control - best practice data that I provide in Ed's Self Teaching & Training Resources.
Lincoln Pulsed MIG Equipment and Robot Axle Weld Cracks.
2000: If you want to make your weld manufacturing life more expensive, more complex and less meaningful than it needs to be, you could have listened to a salesman and then purchased a Lincoln Power Wave for your robot or manual MIG applications. Check the American Axle - Ford - Lincoln axle crack concerns in the equipment section,
The Lincoln Powerwave MIG unit and Ford, robot frame
MIG welds on the world's best selling trucks.
When you utilize so called sophisticated MIG power sources with robots, and
your organization lacks weld process expertise you get unnaceptable welds like above.
There were 6 major issues with the Ford robot frame "pulsed welds" made at a USA tier one supplier. The welds were made with an 0.052 (1.4 mm) MIG wire and a Lincoln Power Wave. Can you look at the welds and identify the process issues? Could you instantly provide the data to correct these sad Frame welds. All the process control data you need for optimum robot weld quality and productivity for any application is available in my low cost, CD training programs.
Robot weld issues because sometimes in robot cells, "TIME accumulates.
For robot welding small fillet / butt welds < 3/16 (< 5 mm) in size, it's often beneficial to use "No Arc Ignition Delay Times". A robot ignition delay time in combination with arc weld start delay time and the pre flow gas time can create too much of a delay at the weld start leading to a larger weld usually in the first 9 mm at the start, (look in the photo above). Remember the times put into that robot program our rarely accurate and can be much higer or lower than the programmer expects.
For two decades the timing issues have been an issue with all robots and needs more consideration from both the robot / MIG equipment manufacturers. Some robot manufactures believe their robots will provide the controls necessary for the weld starts and stops, while in contrast the MIG equipment manufactures believe their power source should provide these controls, it's been this way for two decades, Ying versus Yang, and screw the weld shop.
In contrast with larger welds as typical on parts > 5 mm, the longer the arc start times and pre-gas flow required. To establish the weld puddle with welds larger than 5 mm, an ignition delay time of 0.3 to 1 second. is typical. if you cannot hear the start time data change to the weld data your times are innefective.
Aluminium welds require long start delays, this is necessary to break up the aluminium surface oxides.
Note. In robot cells, often at weld starts, the most troublesome robot weld is often the very first weld, or a weld made after a long weld pause. The problem occurs because the welding wire is "cold", electrons travel better when the wire is hot. For this situation you may benefit from using a shorter wire stick out at these program points. Always have a least 2 robot arc re-strikes programmed for all welds.
Optimum Robot Spray Start Data for carbon steels with 0.035 (1mm) wire welds on parts > 4 mm. For the 0.035 spray weld arc start, set the wire feed at 500 in./min with 27 to 30 volts. This recommendation purposely utilizes low spray transfer wire feed rates, settings which require "minimum spray volts". The low wire feed rate and moderate (not too high) voltage is the best combination for weld start data. This weld data not only provides optimum arc starts it also reduces the potential for wire burn backs to the tip at the arc starts.
There are many factors that influence robot weld profiles at arc starts and at arc ends and these with the resolutions are addressed in all my robot weld process training books. resources.
Robots and MIG equipment. Premature Interface Communication.
Motoman - Fanuc Robot Weld Question.
Ed I am a weld consultant. I came across a weld problem with Fanuc and Motorman robots. At the plant I was assisting there was a Fanuc robot which was 5 years old and it was utilizing a Lincoln Power Wave power source. The plant also had a Motorman robot which was brand new and the power source was a Miller Invision 11. The weld problem was notable on both 3/16 - 1/4 fillet, stitch welds. The welds were 2 to 4 inches in (5 - 10 cm) length and it would appear that 50 to 75% along the weld length the weld appearance would change. Ed what do you think is happening?
Answer. What do you expect from North American designed MIG weld equipment that is trying to communicate with the land of Japan.
I believe you have a case of what I would term as PRC (Premature Robot Cmmunication). The poor interface with this equipment between the robot and power source has left it's mark on your welds. Instead of the robot going to the end of the weld and "instantly" bringing up the pre-programmed Weld End / Crater Fill data, your robots like many of us are premature and bring up the weld end data too soon. Try this, place an additional robot program point about 3 mm from the end of the weld and make sure you complain to that robot company or integrator as this is their SOFTWARE - HARDWARE issue, not yours..
There are many factors that influence robot weld profiles at arc starts / arc ends and these are addressed with many solutions in all my robot weld process training books.resources.
STAINLESS MIG GAS SELECTION & ROBOT MIG WELDS;
Robot Weld Question:
Ed, we robot weld 300 series stainless. The parts are 1.8 to 2.5mm used in an exhaust manifold. The parts have inconsistent fit and gaps. We have been using an 0.045 (1.2mm) wire with a 90% helium - 7,5% Ar - 2.5% CO2 tri-mix with short circuit. Many of the welds are lap welds with gaps and we often find the extremes like either lack of weld fusion
or weld burn through and always distortion. Are we using the correct consumables and which pulsed MIG equipment, would you recommend for this application?
Ed's Weld Answer:
First, stop wasting money on that useless Helium Tri-mix. This gas mix which requires the highest weld voltage along with other things is adding to your weld burn through - distortion issues. See my two part weld gas recommendations in the MIG gas section at this web site. The choice of 0.045 wire on these applications was not correct, the 0.035 wire with higher weld current density - and low to high current short circuit current capability would have been fine. However with this stainless thickness range, this is one of the few welding applications that can justify the use of pulsed MIG.
Reference the pulsed power equipment and consumables. I like the performance and price of OTC pulsed MIG equipment. Use the pulsed mode with an 0.045 wire, and use a simple but honest two part gas mix of 98 argon 2% CO2 which is suited to both pulsed MIG and short circuit. I developed this argon CO2 mix for the North American weld industry back in the 1980s, when I worked for AGA. The weld reality is most gas distributors are simply selling commodities they dont understand and they are either ignorant about the 2% CO2 mix, or they are happy that you are paying a premium for your poorly selected tri mix....
Using the pulsed mode will in contrast to short circuit provide superior weld wetting for the sluggish stainless thicker gage welds especially those welds > 2 mm. The higher pulsed wire feed rates than short circuit should also allow you higher weld travel rates than the short circuit welds which will decrease weld burn through and lower the weld cycle times and decrease distortion.
Remember when welding less than 14 gage or gage parts with gaps you can always switch back the weld transfer mode to short circuit. The argon CO2 mix will again benefit the short circuit as it will reduce weld burn through. As for that poor fit and inconsistent weld gaps in your parts I have a simple solution, fire the engineer responsible for those parts.
There are many factors that influence weld gas selection. If you visit the MIG gas section at this site you will note that I developed three of the major gas mixes sold in North America. Appropriate MIG gas selection without salesmanship is in all my Robot Weld Process Control Training Resources.
Drive Roll Groove Question: Ed I believe you need different guide rolls for different MIG wire types, what's recommended?. Thanks for the site, JH. Manchester UK.?
Ed's Answer on MIG Drive Rolls:
 For solid hard wires use a Vee Groove rolls built for the wire OD. Two large rolls are just as effective a four smaller rolls. Note for MIG welds there is no MIG weld that should ever require using a wire diamter smaller than 0.035 (0.9 - 1mm)
 For flux core wires use a Vee Groove with at least onE roll providing a serrated surface to improve the grip. Watch you do not apply too much drive roll pressure to these wires.
 For aluminium wires use a U Groove with smooth surface again don't use excess drive roll pressure. With aluminium ensure minimum gaps between the inlet, drive rolls and outlet guides to avoid buckling. If using a regular MIG gun use a rigid plastic liner and when possible use a maximum gun length of 10 - 12 feet.
Note: The best MIG gun length for any difficult weld wire is a 10 foot length. What is the value of the free information that you are reading? Will you improve your companies weld quality - productivity and career prospects with the process control - best practices knowlege such as this? Visit Ed'sResources.
Robot Programmer asks a $alary Question.
03/23/2000: Ed, I have been working with robots for almost ten years. I am a highly qualified robot programmer. I have extensive MIG weld process expertise based over 20 years of MIG experience. As you are aware there are many career opportunities available to me at this time, particularly in plants that supply auto - truck, robot welded parts.
I have been looking at many different job opportunities mostly in the auto / truck industry. When I go for a job
interview, I usually find the plants will have numerous robot weld issues. All the plants I visit employ engineers
who obviously do not have the expertise to address the daily, costly, robot or weld issues. I know that I can improve their weld quality - productivity and have a big impact on these companies, however, and here's my gripe. When it comes to the salary offered no one offers to pay me more than they pay their entry level engineers who seem to have little influence on improving anything. The bottom line the salary offered is typically not much more than they pay their manual welders who work few hours overtime. By the way as a salary individual, the only time
I can make "major changes" to the robot programs is on the weekends. So on Saturdays and often Sundays, when the managers and engineers are at home, I get to work without over time pay alongside the hourly paid trades people who get time and a half. Rrgards and thanks for what you do. Mike James.
Ed's Reply: Mike lets face it. when you work for management that do not understand what you do, your remuneration and responsibilities will reflect this. The salaries today offered to the few, experienced robot arc weld programmers (programmers with process control expertise) in North America are not much different than 25 years ago, and in reality are a sad reflection of how out of touch the majority of engineering and manufacturing managers are from the real world requirements for optimized weld automation. Lets face it, to figure out how much your management will understand what you do daily is to take a look at the common two paragraph simple, job descriptions or perhaps like many technicians you wont have a job description. In automotive plants, where managers and engineers waste so much time daily running around putting out fires that they cause, you will typically find that weld quality and productivity responsibility is rarely clearly defined. In too many manufacturing plants that do a large amount of welds, hands off managers and engineers tend to shy away from weld process and equipment ownership.
It's a global weld reality that few manufacturing or HR managers are familiar with the expertise levels necessary for optimum robot arc welding process optimization. From a weld career perspective, If I was in your shoes and looking to improve my job satisfaction, increasing my salary and quality of life. I would look outside the auto industry to industries which offer a higher calibre of management for example manufactures of medical equipment or valves.
Today many companies use robots in the medical, defence, electronic, power and oil industries. With these companies in contrast to the automotive industry, you will typically find a more relaxed, intelligent approach to manufacturing, with better wages, shorter hours and less dead wood management.
In many manufacturing plants where minimal focus or understanding is placed on the expertise necessary to attain optimum, consistent weld quality and productivity from a robot, all you have to do is examine the job descriptions to figure out the management awareness.
IF A JOB DESCRIPTION AND RESPONSIBILITY IS CLEARLY DEFINED FOR HIGH TECH INDIVIDUALS, THE WELD QUALITY - PRODUCTIVITY RESPONSIBILITY, ACCONTABILITY AND SALARY WILL TYPICALLY BE AS IT SHOULD BE.
For those technicians or engineers who understand how their daily functions have a great impact on the weld quality / production attained, and you are frustrated but wish to stay with your knuckle head employer, my message to you is simple, educate your peers as to what you do and show your managers with weld production and quality data the money you daily save your company. As for that working Sat - Sun for free, be a man take pride in your expertise and learn to say no when you think its relevant.
Remember in today's bean counters world, if you don't show the beans saved you have little value.
To help those mangers who wish to put things right and feel the need to actually manage what they are responsible for, I recommend my "Management Engineers Guide to MIG" book and CD resource
NEW TECHNOLOGY IS
OFTEN NOT BETTER.
Hey folks you may not like the message, but you know you won't get this kind of info from your local weld equipment mfg or supplier. More practical robot weld data to follow I can write this stuff forever, but what the heck why can't you miss a dinner and invest in my books or in my self teaching CD training resourcesthat way you have acess to the real valuable info that I don't provide at this site.
If you were going to set a robot to weld inside a sophisticated vessel or container, I hope you would not set the MIG weld data like that shown in the ABB robot photo below. Remember for code quality welds that we now also have TIP TIG which provides superior weld quality and productivity than regular manual and automated Hot and Cold Wire TIG. TIP TIG is very compatible with robots and weld automation. (www.tiptigusa.com).
The Excess Spatter Window (a spatter window can be set for all welds)
reveals poor MIG weld parameter selection.
|This company purchased good robots but the weld sparks shows they lack MIG weld process control expertise
MIG WELDS AND CONTACT
Hello Ed. I recently purchased your "Management and Engineers Guide to MIG Welding book". The 600 page book is everything I had hoped it would be...and then some! The company I work for has a handful of welding engineers scattered throughout North America. Over the past few months I have had a growing number express satisfaction with using 0.030 tips with 0.035 wire robot welds. My issue is this, no one has given me a specific engineering or scientific reason for the contact tip change. Simply, "So-and-so told me to try it. It works for him so I do it to." (I believe the idea originated with a suggestion from one of the consumable sales reps.) This concerns me. I foresee a number of problems including increased uneven tip wear, restricted wire feed, spatter blockage issues, etc and I don't see where current flow would be influenced significantly.
Am I missing something? By the way Ed, thank-you for having the motivation and courage to make this kind of information available. I have not yet come across an opinion from you that I did not share or a concept I did not admire. Regards. Fraser Rock. Weld Eng:
Ed's Reply: Fraser: Thanks for kind words. For the five decades I have worked with the MIG process I have never had to use smaller tips unless there was something wrong with the wire diameter or the tip bore dimensions, and in theses situations, i would change the supplier of the consumables. I have found in many plants that a common issue like this is usually a "distraction or crutch" for plant people (including engineers) who frequently lack the ability to get to the real root cause of their daily weld issues.
Most robot contact tip issues typically result from wire burn backs, poor weld start and end data, incorrect wire stick outs, poor parameters or wire cast - helix issues. A contact tip bore needs to be approx. 0.008 to 0.01 larger than the max wire diam. When you purchase smaller tips than those recommended it's important to remember that with today's inconsistent weld wire quality, the weld wire OD is inconsistent and could be on the plus side. No contact tip should be put on a robot without the robot operators or weld personnel manually running the weld wire through the tip. If the wire and snags, the wire is too large or the tip is too small. If the wire is manually fed through the tip and makes consistent, unrestricted contact, it's fine. If the tip bore is not the correct size, (check with drill gauge), change your contact tip manufacturer, Remember that many of the contact tips sold in North America are made in China and you will find that like most Chinese products, the tip bore dimensions are often all over the place. If the MIG wire OD is too big, change the wire manufacturer and for god's sake get rid of weld distributor that provides you with these poor quality products.
As for those so called weld engineers. For the last decade, there has been in North America many weld quality issues with offshore manufactured, substandard weld consumables. The role of an engineer is not to provide BS or add to the numerous weld shop myths, but to get to the root cause of all welding issues. Regards Ed:
Question: Ref MIG wire burn backs to the Gun Tip.
Ed, we are one of the largest producers in North America of automotive Shocks. I would say that our robots on average weld 200 to 400 parts per-shift. In each robot cell we average 2 to 5 wire burn backs per shift. The burn backs require that we frequently replace the contact tips. As the down time and time required to rectify the problem takes an average of 5 to 10 minutes per burn back you can imagine the production and weld quality consequences. What is the primary cause of this common robot problem, why does this not happen as frequently with manual welders, and are there practical solutions?
Ed's Answer: There are many factors that influence weld wire burn backs and this is one of the prime causes of robot down time. These issues are easily resolved To quickly get to the root cause of all your contact tip issues, attain Ed's Robot Weld Process Control Training Resources.
By the way I had one robot technician tell me the other day that he could not purchase my robot weld process control resources because his Tier One company that had paid over a hundred million dollars for it's robot weld line refused to pay the $390. Its a shame that a company that is likely loosing millions annualy with robot weld quality - productivity issues thinks like this. It's also a shame that the young engineer that likely spent at thousands on his weld education will not invest a few huindred dollars in attaining the real education he really needs so he can get away from those managers that have their head in the sand...
The so called MIG weld benefits from Special
Alloy Contact Tips for Robot Welds?
Ed contact tip issues is a prime cause of robot down time at our plant. We make steel auto / truck shock components. I figure each shift we are loosing 40 to 60 minutes of robot production per- robot cell due to the contact tip issues. We had a saleman tell us about his companies special alloy tips and their influence on tip longevity. My question is should we be doing more work on tip evaluation?
Signed Simon, a frustrated robot weld tech.
Ed's Answer. Thanks to different alloy additions to copper of course some contact tips will offer different properties that can affect wear or conductivity, however and you can take this to the bank, the alloy composition of the tip is rarely relevant to the contact tip life. A larger, thicker contact tip does enable less weld heat to form in the tip in contrast to thinner tips. The real issue in most robot weld cells is to first recognize the root cause of the contact tip failure. You will find that most of the contact tips being replaced are due to wire burn backs and to weld spatter blocking the tip bores.
WHY LET ONE DOLLAR ITEM EFFECT WELD QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY?
Every robot operator should start each shift with a new, $1 contact tip and again replace the tip immediately after lunch. Each Technicain or Engineer responsible for the robots should at least twice a week, check the contact tip bore diameters and the quality of the tips purchased. The complete check list and my seven step program to prevent costly robot down time is item 4 and you know where that is. As for the special alloy tips if you continue to purhase them, give me a call, I have a bidge I can sell you in Brookyln for less than a $100.
Note: By the way, I created a patent on ceramic - Cu tips, and those tips were designed to allow extended MIG wire stick outs. This enables higher wire feed rates (faster weld travel rates) with lower MIG weld current.. These are two real world weld benefits for robot gauge welds. but don't go looking for them..
Robots and Gas Flow Issues.
Ed I'm having a hard time keeping flow meters from "blowing their lids" in my plant. We've run both ESAB and Rexarc flow meters and over time they are both failing. At the start of the weld the solenoid opens letting the gas flow into the flowmeter...pegs the BB out on the top of the unit then settles to the set flow rate. I have tried snubbers and I have tried placing the FM before the solenoid. We have 50 psi of 90%AR - 10%CO2 coming down from ceiling to each weld cell. Then provide a 10-15 ft flex hose to the solenoid. The flow meter is hard plumbed to solenoid, then 4ft flex to 8' Torch bundle. Do I need to rearrange? Is this common? Surely not! FYI, we have 2000 arc starts/day on these FM's, some last 4 months, others last 4 days! Should I remove the FM altogether and get a set calibrated orifice like at www.okcc.com? I did turn down my pressure leaving my gas mixer to 40psi but all FM's are calibrated at 50psi, so it throws off my readings. (Help)..
Ed's Answer. Most MIG gas flow meters have the pressure regulated at 20 to 30 psi. I would install a pressure gauge at your outlets and lower your gas pressure to 20 - 30 psi. The only concern for MIG gas flow is the flow rate coming out of the MIG gun nozzle, and the robot operators should chaeck this at the start of each shift. This flow rate should be 30 - 35 cuft /hr.
Question. WELD POROSITY:
Ed we have an extensive porosity issue with our robot welds would appreciate your thoughts on the subject.
MIG WELDS AND POROSITY: What is weld porosity, it's a cavity, pore or many discontinuities that form in a weld from a gas and metal reaction. The porosity can trapped in the weld or at the weld surface. The porosity is typically round in shape but can also be elongated. The primary cause of porosity in auto - truck plants is lubricants on the parts and the result of fast weld speeds and poor weld data.
ROBOTS AND MIG POROSITY. When you find the robot weld porosity occurs on each part at the same location, and it's not at the weld start or the weld end, examine the robot movement and see if the robot arm is causing a restriction of the gas flow line. Also it's common with robot cells to see a severe gas flow restriction due to the narrow orrifice gas line connections. In a robot cell it's critical that at the start of each shift that the cell operator measures gas flow as it "exits the gun nozzle". If the porosity is at the weld start or stop increase the gas pre flow and post flow times.
ALIGNED OR RANDOM WELD POROSITY. The common causes of localized or aligned group of gas pores with random distribution. If the weld surface is clean this porosity is typically a result of part contamination. If the weld surfcae is oxidized (grey) then look to insufficient gas flow issues. Also small weld lengths and small fast freeze welds and arc blow will contribute to this porosity
ELONGATED WELD POROSITY. (Wagon Tracks). This porosity is typically found parallel to the weld axis. This classic porosity is evident when moisture is found in the gas shielded flux cored wires, (a too common issue). The pores rise to the suface of the welds, (usually in the weld center) and before they can pass into the solifying flux cored slag, the ores which can be large and small will form a rough line typically called Waggon Tracks. Increasing the flux cored wire stick out and increasing the wire feed rate will help. Storing wires in a dry environment also reduces potential. If however this is a common problem with the FCA wires change your FCA brand and change your supplier. The bottom line, avoid weaves and adding arc and weld energy decrease the weld cooling rate and should produce less porosity.
LARGE PORE WELD POROSITY. If weld surface is clean and does not look oxidized, the large pore MIG and FCAW porosity is usually a result of excessive gas flow. Gas turbulence occurs with gas flow greater than 40 cuft/hr and is especially prevelant in Vee - j groove welds.. If weld surface is grey and dirty, the cause is otfen a result of insufficient gas less than 20 cuft /hr. Gas flow must be measured at the gun nozzle.
The apathetic weld management at this tier one company, allowed the selection of an oversized, 0.052 (1.4mm) MIG wire for the robot frame thin gauge welds, below.
The hydro formed Ford Truck Frame welds shown are more than a bad welds, they are an indication of poor both poor weld management and company that does not understand weld process controls.
Can you identify the root cause
of these Ford cold truck frame MIG welds?
A manager, engineer, supervisor or robot technician that had weld process control expertise would look at the above robot welds on the big three hydro formed truck frames, and instanly know what the weld issues and resolutions were.
The above tier one, Ford frame, globular welds with evident lack of weld fusion are not the fault of the robots or the over priced Lincoln Power Wave MIG equipment utilized. These and the other similar globular welds on the truck frames were the result of inexperienced, hands off managers and engineers who selected oversize MIG weld wires and used undertrained robot personnel to provide thousands of welds that jepodized the structural integrity with some of the world's most expensive truck frames.
Fanuc and Lincoln Power Wave.
and 2004 Ford 500 Cradle / Frame Welds.
Date 23. July 2004. 2004 Ford 500 Cradle / Frame Welds.. This report is a condensed review (changed with a little added humour too keep things sane) of a Ford robot weld line used to MIG weld the Ford 500 steel cradles and sub assemblies. I evaluated this new robot line to establish the root cause of the many weld issues that were impacting the cradle and frame robot weld quality and production.
This mid west, Ford plant purchased approx 100 Fanuc robots with Lincoln Power Wave weld equipment. The weld wire type was E70S-6, and size 0.045 (1.2 mm). It was notable the the Fanuc robots at this plant did not have automated TCP controls or any weld joint tracking equipment. The hourly production range was 60 to 70% of it's goal, and the daily weld rework was > 40%.
When purchasing robots for an auto or any high volume manufacturing facility, it's important that the management and engineers responsible do a weld risk assessment and that they understand how the parts or the robot equipment selected can impact either the weld quality or production. It was evident at this Ford plant that the manufacturing management and engineers responsible for the robot welds had little expertise or interest in owning the processes or the equipment that make their profits.
Note: With robot MIG welds, the primary concerns with common auto truck parts welding 2 to 4 mm is the attainment of acceptable and consistent weld fusion. Its a sad fact that on steel parts > 2 mm, one in three or four welds in the auto industry will typically will reveal marginal or lack of weld fusion. In contrast the weld concerns for parts less than < 2 mm, is typically to avoid weld burn through.
The Ford plant provided numerous welds on steel parts < 2 mm. On these parts the MIG weld burn through risk potential was high, and it was compounded by the poor weld data, oversized weld wire, unnaceptable part dimensional issues, plus lack of ability for the robots to track the weld joints, no control of the robot Tool Center Point (TCP), along with management and engineering process ignorance.
As the Ford plant ramps up to try and attain its 100% robot production goal, thanks to the apathetic engineering involved in producing stamped parts to the design dimensions, the reality is that it's unlikely that the part dimensions will improve, (most welded part dimension issues increase with amount of stamped parts provided). Therefore the weld issues, unless radically addressed will increase daily.
I found In this plant, that lke many, the weld consumable selection was influenced more by the purchasing department than by knowleable engineers, just as the robot and weld equipment selection for this plant has had more to do with salesmanship than it did with weld - robot engineering logic.
THE IMPORTANCE OF
ROBOT TCP CONTROLS.
THE FORD PLANT WAS LOOSING - 20 MINUTES/HR PER-ROBOT PRODUCTION LOSS BECAUSE THE FORD MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERS LACKED THE BASIC KNOWLEGE NECESSARY TO ORDER THE CORRECT EQUIPMENT AND IMPLEMENT EFFECTIVE WELD BEST PRACTICES AND PROCESS CONTROLS:
Part dimension ACCURACY and TCP controls are critical when welding thin gage applications. The thinner the gage, the greater the weld gap sensitivity. Thin gage requires smaller welds which require faster weld speeds that require stable joint dimensions.
Torch Control Point (TCP), apart from maintaining the robot program point accuracy of the wire to work, also enables an altered program to be put back to the original approved program. In this Ford facility, with the robot cells purchased, there are no means for accurately checking the robot TCP, and you will find programmers constantly making changes to the welds, none of which have anything in common with the original so called pre-qualified weld program.
While I was at this plant, the plant typically was loosing slightly over 20 minutes/hr of robot down time. The lost production from the 33 robots in opertion (33 x 20 minutes = 660 min/ hr) The bottom line was each hour the plant was loosing > 30% of its production.
Note: On robot welded parts with gaps or inconsistent dimensions, to compensate, you typically have to be able to place "oversized weave welds". Over sized welds not only decrease weld travel rates, they can increase the weld burn through potential, especially on the 1.5 - 2 mm parts. To avoid weld burn through with the larger welds, aggressive weld weaves are beneficial, the plant programmers made no use of the weld weaves in any of the robot programs. Unfortunately with the numerous weld burn through issues, the resulting holes in the parts were disrupting the weld arcs, causing the weld wire to end up with excess length (excess wire stick out) which was a root cause for poor arc start and for the contact tip issues.
To minimize the potential robot weld issues that will occur, the Ford plant management needs more focus on the implementation of best robot weld practices and knowlege about process controls (cost a whopping $400 at this site).
FORD AND THE LINCOLN PULSED MIG EQUIPMENT.
2004: For more than two decades, the major MIG equipment manufactures have been developing and promoting pulsed MIG equipment for "steel applications".
When so called engineers have to rely on "sales advice" for technical answere they get what they desreve. The Lincoln pulsed equipment purchased for your robot weld lines has undergone years of development, yet still in 2004 provides "poor arc stability" along with arc length sensitivity. The pulsed arc length sensitivity makes the pulsed mode unsuitable for most of your high weld speed steel applications. It's ironic that the weld equipment your company purchased has cost >50% more than the available superior, stable, traditional CV equipment that could have been used. The pulsed weld equipment purchased will also likely cost three times as much to repair and you will need to keep more spare equipment than normally would have been required with traditional, more durable CV equipment.
FORD AND THE PULSED MIG AND HIGH SPEED WELD CONCERNS:
When using an 0.045 (1.2mm) MIG wire and pulsed welding on the cross members, to attain the desired minimum weld travel rate of 45 ipm, on the 1.6 mm lap welds, the MIG weld wire has to have a "very short arc length" and virtually make contact with the weld surface. This required wire to work contact not only disrupts the pulsed transfer, it causes extensive weld spatter which negatively impacts the contact tip life. The weld spatter is also contaminating your fixtures causing part assembly and fit issues.
When establishing the Power Wave pulsed trim voltage, (the arc length) with this high speed pulsed application, if the pulsed weld voltage (arc length) is set to a none weld spatter condition, (requires increased arc length), the pulsed weld transfer and instability at 45 - 50 ipm weld travel rates will cause "skip welds" (missed welds and weld blobs on the parts).
Typically with this 2004 pulsed MIG power source technology, when pulsed welding we need a sufficient arc length to enable the pulsed MIG weld drops to form and transfer across an arc gap without making a short circuit contact with the work and with the wire tip. With the Lincoln pulsed MIG equipment selected the desired minimum arc length required for optimum pulsed weld transfers is detrimental when pulsed welding thin gage parts using 0.045 wire at the "high weld speeds". If logic and ownership had been applied by the Ford engineers, the weld equipment and the robots would have been tested before the purchase order was produced for the equipment and also the PO contracts should have stipulated that the weld quality - productivity goals be produced at least for 4 hours before the robots and weld equipment was delivered to Ford.
The thin gage parts also limit the allowed pulsed wire feed rates which limit the Lincoln Power Wave pulsed frequency utilized. The low pulsed frequency with the large wire diameters and a weld which for 50% of its time is at a background current of less than 100 amps resulted in an unstable weld transfer mode unsuited to high weld speeds on the Ford 500 cradle welds.
The robot, high speed skip weld issues at the Ford plant are the same pulsed weld issues that every wheel manufacturer and torque converter manufacture has had to deal with for almost two decades. Another ironic fact is when you use the Lincoln pulsed equipment in the traditional spray transfer modes which provides improved arc stability is the weld decision maker may not be
aware that the slope influenced performance of the traditional spray mode from the pulsed MIG equipment is typically inferior to the lower cost traditional CV equipment.
To attain high robot weld speeds with weld transfer stability, I recommend the pulsed mode should be replaced with the more stable, less arc length sensitive "spray transfer mode". While the spray mode runs hotter than the pulsed this is not a concern for the welds on lap welded parts in which the two parts combine for > 2mm. The the weld heat can be reduced through the use of
smaller MIG wire diameter such as an 0.040 or 0.035.
Note: Remember this time period is 2004 for pulsed MIG equipment, and although I had been describing these and similar pulsed issues on this site for at least seven years, managers and engineers in the auto industry were happy to get advice from the people who made and sold the equipment. Poor performing pulsed equipment was something companies like MIller. ESAB and Lincoln
did not discuss in public. There is not be the same pulsed MIG electronic and weld transfer concerns with most of the pulsed equipment sold > 2006.
CONCLUSION FOR THE FORD PLANT: I could waste my time and show you the numerous list of weld issues and the resolutions I provided for this plant. An ironic point also is Ford spends millions every year on training for robot weld applications such as this, and it's clearly evident that the management lack the technical ability to figure out the training that will attain the results they desire. I would hope that one day an intelligant, pragmatic Ford executive that sits in his ivory tower and does not have ego issues will read this stuff and will then come to the conclusion of where the responsibility lies and what has to be done.
As I wrote the above Ford report, I was also involved with a tier one company that was using 0.052 (1.4 mm) weld wires on Ford truck frames that were typically 2 to 4 mm thick. This company was also using the same Lincoln pulsed MIG Lincoln equipment. They also went through the consequences of the pulsed arc instability, and they were unable to use high spray parameters required as a result of management selecting an oversize 0.052 wire.
As they could not dial in the required MIG spray parameters, the robot programmers at the plant unknowingly dialled in lower "globular parameters" which started to cause all types of production and quality problems, (see frame plant report at this site).The globular transfer caused over 80% weld rework. The globular drops on the wire tips also caused extensive robot down time.
A reasonable question that could be asked was which idiot at the Ford and Tier One company ordered the oversize 0.052 wire, and dont be surprised if the answer was found not in the management offices and engineering departments (no process ownership) but was found in the purchasing department.
July 30-04. E Mail to Ed. Ref Miller Pulsed MIG issues.
Miller Accu-Pulse / Auto Axcess Issues.
Ed: Your description of arc sensitivity with high speed pulsed welds is exactly what I am experiencing with our robots and the new Miller Accu-Pulse process / Auto Axcess.
The new auto bumpers we are welding are thin gage, 1/16 (1.6mm) HSLA and we have weld heat martensite concerns.
To minimize the weld heat into our parts, I tried to weld above 40 IPM with the Accu-Pulse using Miller's recommended weld settings we could not do the welds due to weld skipping and arc instability.
We went to an 0.035 wire and could not get the travel speeds so we changed back to 0.045 wire (1.2mm) wire and had to run the pulsed arc with the arc length buried in the part. The small arc resulted in extensive weld spatter, also the part could not handle the pulsed weld transfer and with the resulting high weld heat we had weld burn through holes all over the place.
With the disappointing Miller pulsed weld equipment results. we took your advice and changed the weld transfer mode to CV, using high circuit with the 0.045 wires. We are attaining 40 IPM travel rates and I have no spatter of any consequences on the parts. Also we are having no arc stability problems with the short circuit.m I hate to admit it but this is is another pulsed failure in my book. I am also pissed of at the fact that we could have got these short circuit weld results from much lower cost CV weld equipment without all the costly head aches.
Regards from a fan but a frustrated robot tech... G.S.
Please note I have not even touched the surface of the MIG weld issues that will occur in a robot weld cell, but I will tell you that I have covered the majority of the global MIG weld quality - productivity issues with the resolutions, in my Robot MIG Weld Best Practice - Process Control self teaching and training resources.
Please also visit the Robot Management Section and extensive robot advice in the pulsed MIG Equipment and in the weld Sections.