Weldreality
Home Page.
TIP TIG Welding
Home Page
TIG Welding
All Weld and Steels Programs
Ed's Process Control Training Materials
MIG Welding
Steels   > 4mm
MIG Welding
Steels < 4mm
Pulsed MIG Welding
MIG Welding Gases
MIG Welders And Equipment
Robots & Weld Management
Robots and MIG
Welding Tips
TIG Welding Tips
MIG / Flux Cored
Pipe Welding
Welding Advice
Welding Forum
Ed's Bio / Contact
Ed's Weld Projects

Welding Books

MIG Welding Book, Management
A Management & Engineers Guide to MIG Weld Quality, Productivity and Costs

Gas Metal Arc Welding Book
Manual and Robotic (MIG) Gas Metal Arc Welding Book

MIG and Flux Core Welding Book
Flux Cored and MIG weld process controls

Manual MIG Welding Book
Manual MIG Welding Process Control

(Also in Spanish)
" Proceso de Soldadur MIG Manual "

Welding CD's

Robot Welding CD
Robot MIG welding. Best Weld Practices and Process Controls

MIG Welding CD
Manual MIG Welding. Best Weld Practices and Process Controls

Flux Core Welding CD
Flux Cored Best Weld Practices and Process Controls

MIG Welding Process Controls
DVD Film "MIG Process Controls Made Simple"

Order these MIG Welding or Flux Cored Training Materials Now




     
 
ED CRAIG. www.weldreality.com.

The world's largest website on MIG - Flux Cored - TIG Welding


Chrysler flux cored weld issues

Advanced TIP TIG Welding
TIP TIG Welding is always better quality than TIG and 100 to 500% faster with superior quality than TIG - MIG - FCAW.

 
 
   


Come on Chrysler, it's time for weld reality.



An e-mail question addressed to this site.

Ed, the tier one automotive parts company I work for, has been told by the corporate Chrysler engineer that they have to use "self shielding flux cored wires" when welding galvaneald, parts. These flux cored wires cause us numerous weld issues. Our weld rework rates as high as sixty percent. The workers frequently complain about the weld fumes and the paint shop is appalled at having to paint over weld slag. What is the logical, justification for using these wires?

Ed's Answer: I feel your pain and this Chrysler nonsense has been going on too long. Let me tell you one story about this same engineer and how his ridiculous weld recommendations have so far cost Chrysler and their suppliers at least fifty million dollars.



The million dollar per-month weld fiasco that occurred at one of Chrysler's stamping facilities in Ohio during the nineteen nineties.

The following is a description of an automated weld disaster, it's an indication of the costly damage that can result from weld process ignorance and management manufacturing isolation.

The Chrysler robot welds were made on galvanealed, cross-member parts, 2 to 2.5 mm thick. The cross member welds had to be made with the weld consumables selected by the Chrysler corporate engineer responsible for weld specifications.
The weld wires selected were large self shielded flux cored wires that required a high, weld current range of 320 / 350 amps. This weld current had more in common with welding a 6 mm fillet weld than a 2 mm gage weld. The current was the optimum (stable) current required for the large electrodes.

The weld current used on the thin parts was far too high for the thin gage cross-member parts.

 


HOW MANY ENGINEERS OR DESIGNERS HAVE AN APPRECIATION FOR A WELD CONSUMABLE WELD CURRENT COMPATIBILITY WITH THE STEEL THICKNESS OF THEIR APPLICATIONS ?

HOW MANY ENGINEERS ARE AWARE OF THE OPTIMUM CURRENT RANGE OF THE COMMON AVAILABLE MIG AND FCAW CONSUMABLES?

THESE SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR ROBOT WELD PROCESS CONTROL ARE COVERED EXTENSIVELY IN ALL MY PROCESS BOOKS.



The excess yet minimum weld current required by the self shielded flux cored wires created so many weld holes in the cross-member parts that up to 10-13 manual welders were required each shift at the Chrysler plant for the robot weld repairs.

The welds had so many weld holes that the manual welders re-welded the total robot weld length, which was over 2 meters in length, The result was weld slag on top of weld slag. Its ironic that the finished welds would not have been accepted in any facility that applies logical weld quality criteria to the welds it produces.
The Chrysler plant manger informed me that the total weld rework costs for his plant was costing a million dollars per month.

As the weld fumes were dangerous from the cacogenic self shielded wires, the manual welders had to wear breathing apparatus and have a break every few hours.

This weld fiasco went on for more than a year. The Chrysler corporate engineer's justification for the use of these unsuitable weld wires was that they were necessary for welding galvanealed to reduce micro crack potential from the zinc alloy reactions. It's notable that if these products could achieve what the corporate engineer stated they could do, the electrode wire manufacturer would be the first to brag about this benefit in the wire promotional literature, of course the weld consumable manufacture is not that stupid.

The frustrated plant manager had little respect for the weld advice from his corporate engineer. The plant manager asked that I rectify the welding problem..

I knew it was a hopeless task to convince this inexperienced corporate engineer to take responsibility for his multi-million dollar fiasco. I suppose also he did not want his organization to know where to lay the blame for the millions of dollars lost. I proposed to the Chrysler engineering team and managers responsible for the cross members, that I simply weld the parts with a robot and the MIG process, then provide micro / macro and mechanical test results of the resulting welds.

I robot welded the parts using an E70S-3, 0.035 (1 mm) MIG consumable. I eliminated the the weld burn through issues. I then qualified the MIG welds through an unbiased major Detroit testing agency. The weld test report indicated that the MIG welds provided superior weld results and passed all the mechanical / micro weld tests with flying colors. I presented the results to the Chrysler corporate engineers and their peers.

The solution I presented would immediately save Chrysler a million dollars a month. All the weld data presented at the meeting indicated that the primary issue was with the weld process and consumables selected, there was also some gap issues. The data was well received by the plant manager. However after the Chrysler engineers reviewed the report I was shocked when informed that the engineer responsible for the weld specification would not admit the weld consumables were the issue. This engineer would not approve a weld process change.

The Chrysler corporate management who managed the engineers responsible for the parts received the report. These managers understood little about the weld process recommended, they could however read. I believe they simply did not have the balls to take action. The engineer responsible did with reservation allow the use of a smaller self shielded weld wire.
Shortly after the meeting, the less than two year old, multi-million robot weld line was shut down and the robots, the application and the Ohio robot jobs were swept under the carpet and moved south to Mexico.

I firmly believe the engineer responsible for this weld disaster was advised to use the self shielded flux cored wires by the company that makes this obnoxious weld consumable product. However the engineer is paid to engineer.

Many weld consumable manufacturers will recommend a weld consumable that their competitors do not sell. Typically this may not be the best consumable for the application, yet this common welding sales tactic, ensures no one else can bid on on the consumable business.




DURING THE LAST TWO DECADES, IN NORTH AMERICA THE EASIEST PLACE TO SELL THE WORST WELDING CONSUMABLES WAS AN AUTOMOTIVE OR TRUCK PLANT.

As indicated by the weld mechanical tests, there is no justification for the use of self shielded flux cored products on galvanealed cars or truck parts. The MIG process allows the use of the unique, low energy short circuit process, in which the arc goes on off many times per-second. I believe the selection of the "open arc", higher weld energy, poorly suited self shielded weld wires was based simply on " weld process ignorance" that was fed by " weld consumable salesmanship"

It's unfortunate that as you read this today that the Chrysler corporate weld engineer is still informing part suppliers in North America and Mexico that they must use the self shielded flux cored consumables.


Weld Reality. From a weld mechanical, weld chemistry, weld quality and weld productivity perspective, in contrast to MIG wires, the self shielded flux cored wires offer no weld benefits, they do however offer excess weld spatter, tenacious weld slag and weld fumes that would be considered a dangerous weapon in Iraq.



WELD FACTS:

[a] WELD HEAT: In contrast to MIG short circuit transfer, on thin gage applications the self shielded, straight polarity, "open arc" weld transfer mode from the flux cored wires can dramatically increase the weld burn-through potential of thin gage butt weld applications. Even when smaller wires are used. Its a simple weld fact that today the smallest self shielded flux cored wire, 0.035 (1mm) cannot weld butt weld on steels <1.6 mm wit out weld burn through.

[b] WELD FUMES: In contrast to MIG the weld fumes produced from the self shielded wires are much more hazardous and actually contain cacogenic components that few people want to discuss. I know recently when I welded with these products for two hours I felt sick and bilious that evening.

When using the self shielded weld wires, weld shops have to invest in costly, large ventilation equipment that would not be required with MIG wires. Of special concern is the secondary smoke that gets out of the robot cells. Also consideration must be given for the long term health of the manual welders that have will have to use these wires to carry out the weld repairs which will be necessary on most gage galvanealed welded parts.

[c] WELD SPATTER: With MIG welding the weld spatter is controllable. With the self shielded products additional man power is typically required for weld spatter clean up. Also the weld cell equipment and weld part fixtures will typically be heavily contaminated with the unnecessary, excessive weld spatter.


[d] WELD SLAG & PAINT: MIG produces a minuscule amount of thin slag. In contrast, the self shielded flux cored wire weld slag will be tenacious, excessive and almost impossible to remove, an E coat or paint point that the Chrysler engineers seems to give minimal consideration.

[e] WELD REPAIRS: Although its a common practice in automotive / truck plants, placing a self shielded wire repair weld on top of a weld with slag is an invitation to a future weld product liability. When repairing the self shielded welds with the weld slag in place, both the weld fusion and weld quality potential will suffer greatly. For a company that has a weld specification that specifies a concern for weld porosity limitations, it's ludicrous for the same organization to allow self shielded repair welds over welds with slag. The repair welds will have poor fusion and be saturated with slag and porosity.

[f] WELD MECHANICALS: The fact that the part is galvanealed or galvanized is irrelevant.
I have had mechanical weld tests performed on these wires and also on MIG wires, the test results indicate that MIG provides the best internal and external weld quality and meets all the mechanical needs.

[g] WELD COSTS. It amazes me that in an industry that looks for so many ways to shave a $1 of the cost of a vehicle that some one would recommend the self shielded wires.

The price of the self shielded wires can be two to three times per-pound the cost of a MIG wire. The weld deposition efficiency of the self shielded wires also dramatically increases the weld consumable costs. With a MIG weld set correctly, the weld deposition efficiency should be at least 99%. As the self shielded wire weld may be half weld and half slag and spatter,
I would anticipate that for every pound of self shielded wire purchased, only about 50 percent ends up as weld.

Example. Lets say a foot long MIG weld requires 0.1 lbs. The MIG wire cost $1 a pound so the MIG weld wire cost per foot of weld is 0.10 cents. In this proportion the weld gas for the 0.1. lbs would be approx. 0.10 cents so the MIG consumables cost for the foot of weld would be 0.20 cents.

The self shielded wire cost $3 lb. Due to poor weld deposition efficiency it takes 0.15 lbs of wire for the foot of weld. The self shielded wire will cost 0.045 cents per foot of weld.
20 cents for the MIG / gas versus 45 cents for the self shielded now multiply that by 50 feet of welds on millions of vehicles.

MIG wire is more stable than the self shielded wires and offers the unique arc on - arc off short circuit transfer mode. On many thin gage applications <1.6 mm, in contrast to self shielded the MIG process will allow for higher wire feed (higher weld deposition rates). Typically MIG will allow for a twenty to forty percent increase in weld deposition. This means when using MIG in contrast to self shielded wires, there may be a potential of 15 to 30 percent reduction in weld labor costs or a 15 to 30% increase in robot weld speeds.

035 self shielded data for 16 - 18 gage butt welds, wire feed 140 ipm, 80 amps, 14 - 17 volts robot weld travel 12 to 14 ipm. On butt welds and on metals less <1.6mm, beware weld burn through.

035 MIG on 16 gage. Short Circuit, wire wire feed 250 ipm, 17 volts, robot weld travel 20 to 25 ipm.

A great impact on weld costs is robot weld efficiency and weld rework costs. Thanks to Chrysler, robots are today using the worlds most inefficient weld process and generating weld rework that's typically greater than 60 percent.


WHEN A CORPORATE ENGINEER'S LACK OF WELD PROCESS EXPERTISE LEADS TO POOR WELD DECISIONS, THE COSTS TO HIS CORPORATION CAN SOMETIMES BE MILLIONS.

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS IN THE AUTO INDUSTRY EMPLOY ENGINEERING MANAGERS. UNFORTUNATELY MANY OF THESE MANAGERS HAVE LESS WELD PROCESS EXPERIENCE THAN THEIR INEXPERIENCED WELD DECISION MAKERS. IN THIS CASE IT'S EASY TO UNDERSTAND THE CHRYSLER CORPORATION'S MANAGEMENT APATHY, AND WHY THEY DO NOT RESPOND TO THE WELDING PROBLEMS THEY IMPOSE ON THEMSELVES AND THEIR SUPPLIERS.

THE SCENARIO DISCUSSED AND EMPHASIZED ON THIS WEB SITE IS USUALLY AN INDICATION OF THE MANAGEMENT GLASS WALL THAT IS FOUND THROUGHOUT THE AUTO /TRUCK INDUSTRY. THIS INVISIBLE WALL ISOLATES MANAGERS AND ENGINEERS FROM REAL WORLD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES.

To learn more about poor robot management practice click here.

 

 

As the gage thickness has decreased as with galvanealed hydro formed products as thin as 1mm, the self shielded flux cored process even with 0.045 and 0.035 (1.2 - 1 mm) wires is now being recommended by Chrysler. These wires are simply not suited. The MIG process should be used on all galvanealed parts, especially on parts <1.6mm. It would be beneficial if management at Chrysler recognized the health and cost consequences of this ridiculous situation.

Managers should consider providing designers and engineers with weld process control training. Provide a training program that places focus on design compatibility with the weld process utilized.

 

E Mail.Dear Ed.

July 05.

It looks like we are just starting out on a new Chrysler project welding a galvannealed product, Galvanneal NS 6000 D series 44a. According to the Chrysler spec, we would be
allowed to use a solid carbon steel ER 70S-3 MIG wire, but they require a 75 argon - 25 CO2 gas mixture for this. I think Chrysler takes the cake on this gas selection. By the way if our engineers had selected galvanized material, according to the Chrysler spec we would have been forced into using the terrible self shielded FCAW process.....Is the Chrysler weld engineer from this planet? What I also don't understand is the fact that they are specifying a coated material, and then we are still required to e-coat the part. I wonder what the reasoning is behind double coating the cradles.....I'm sure they don't even know.

Regards GR. Tier One.

Ed's Answer" there is no rationalization for any of the welding logic that comes from Corporate Chrysler. Their chief welding engineer has for more than a decade been in the wrong profession. The choice of the 75-25 gas restricts the use of spray transfer on parts over 0.070 and when used will be the cause of spatter. As for the self shielded wire, no one knows why the Chrysler corporate engineer still insists on the world's worst electrode for coated materials. As for the double coating, it makes no sense. What does make sense is to coat the parts after welding as the weld destroys the coating in the weld area. As I said don't look for logic when dealing with Chrysler..


E-Mail From PL England.

Ed.

I have just read your Chrysler Neon article regarding the crossmemebers and self shielded flx cored wire issues. I fully endorse your views and comments. It is a shame that many "welding engineers" in the automotive industry lack the actual knowledge and skills to fulfill this critical role. I myself am a welding engineer for a tier one supplier to the auto industry and see this too often. As a time served boilermaker in the UK, I feel that there is a hugh lack of process knowledge and experience with the welding and engineering personel in the auto industry. I must also thank you for your books 'A Management & Engineering Guide to MIG & the Training' materials both of which we as a company refer to regularly.
cheers

PL - England

 

Take the Flux Cored Welding Test to determine your knowledge