Weldreality
Home Page.
TIP TIG
Home Page
All Weldreality Weld and Steels Programs
Ed's MIG & Flux Cored Manual & Robot Weld Process Control
Training Materials
MIG Welding
Steels   > 4mm
MIG Welding
Steels < 4mm
Pulsed MIG Welding
MIG Welding Gases
MIG Welders And Equipment
Robots & Weld Management
Robots and MIG
Welding Tips
TIG Welding Tips
MIG / Flux Cored
Pipe Welding
Welding Advice
Welding Forum
Ed's Bio / Contact
Ed's Weld Projects

Welding Books

MIG Welding Book, Management
A Management & Engineers Guide to MIG Weld Quality, Productivity and Costs

Gas Metal Arc Welding Book
Manual and Robotic (MIG) Gas Metal Arc Welding Book

MIG and Flux Core Welding Book
Flux Cored and MIG weld process controls

Manual MIG Welding Book
Manual MIG Welding Process Control

(Also in Spanish)
" Proceso de Soldadur MIG Manual "

Welding CD's

Robot Welding CD
Robot MIG welding. Best Weld Practices and Process Controls

MIG Welding CD
Manual MIG Welding. Best Weld Practices and Process Controls

Flux Core Welding CD
Flux Cored Best Weld Practices and Process Controls

MIG Welding Process Controls
DVD Film "MIG Process Controls Made Simple"

Order these MIG Welding or Flux Cored Training Materials Now


Welding Software



     
 
ED CRAIG. www.weldreality.com.

The world's largest website on MIG - Flux Cored - TIG Welding


Pulse MIG Welding Tips 2

Advanced TIP TIG Welders
TIP TIG Welding is always better quality than TIG and 100 to 500% faster with superior quality than TIG - MIG - FCAW.

 
 
   

Pulsed MIG Welding Tips Section One.

.

Pulsed MIG Welding Continued.
Section 2:



Thanks to the many changes that occurred over two decades during the pulsed equipment evolution, at this site, time frames will often precede my comments.

.

< 2006. Numerous global weld shops purchased pulsed MIG equipment before 2006. When promoting pulsed equipment for welding steels, the marketing and sales personnel who manufactured and sold the costly pulsed equipment may have told your organizations that with the pulsed MIG equipment you would not have to worry about:


[a] poor arc starts,
[b] weld spatter,
[c] smoke,
[d] weld inconsistency.


It's one thing for sales or equipment reps to promote real world weld benefits about a weld process or consumable, it's another thing to promote ignorance or stretch the truth to an already confused weld industry.

Weld Reality. "Arc starts". Take any well made, traditional CV power source manufactured since the nineteen sixties. With this power source you should have the ability while manually welding to produce "100 arc starts" without one arc start issue. Those golden oldie power sources will provide consistent arc starts as long as correct weld data is applied.

MIG arc start issues in many "robot cells" are not typically caused by that USA or Japanese manufactured MIG power source. Most of the robot arc start issues are simply a result of people induced, poor robot weld start and weld end data.
If you want to cut down on robot down time, my robot MIG Process Control book and training CDs provide the unique data required for optimum robot arc starts.

Weld Reality. "Weld spatter". If spray or short circuit weld transfer is set with "correct weld data", the weld spatter that will occur on most applications will be minuscule and should not have cost consequences for most weld applications.

Weld Reality. "Weld smoke". The weld smoke from carbon steel welds and traditional MIG spray transfer welds with optimum argon mixes that contain 10 to 20% CO2 is minimal, especially if the weld voltage is set for the shortest arc lengths. In over three decades of testing MIG smoke that occurs with carbon steel welds and argon mixes, the smoke has never been proven to be a health issue. Also lets face it, some of the largest complaints about weld smoke come from union shops in which the majority of robot and manual cells have an exhaust system installed.

Weld Reality. "Weld consistency"
. On the subject of weld consistency and steel welds. In forty plus years of MIG welding using good CV equipment, I have never made a weld that was negatively influenced by the so called inconsistency of the CV MIG power source. In contrast, with with the majority
of pulsed equipment built before 2006, to attain your most consistent weld results, you simply switched the pulsed mode "off".


.

Visit my MIG equipment evaluations to see pulsed
equipment and real world arc consistency issues.

.

WELD MANAGEMENT AND PULSED:



THAT MANAGER OR ENGINEER WHO LACKS PROCESS CONFIDENCE, WILL BE RELUCTANT TO PUSH THROUGH PROCESS OR CONSUMABLE CHANGES:

Irrespective of the weld equipment utilized, the biggest deterrent to weld optimization through weld change is often apathetic, process manufacturing and engineering management who may be provided with cost effective, TOUCH IT, FEEL IT, SEE IT solutions to their weld manufacturing issues, and yet they simply lack the manufacturing balls and process confidence to change what's happening on the shop floors.



2008. MIG EQUIPMENT AND WELD COST JUSTIFICATION: After MIG welding for four plus decades, I believe all you need for optimum welds on the majority of all carbon steels, low alloy steels and stainless applications is a traditional, low cost, durable, easy to repair CV MIG power source like this approx. $3200, Miller, CP302 MIG power source and wire feed package. Similar packages are available from ESAB and Lincoln.

.


TECHNOLOGY VERSUS REAL WORLD WELD BENEFITS.
When you examine the pulsed MIG electronic technology required to create one weld drop per pulse, it's impressive. When you examined the weld application benefits derived from the single drop per-pulse process on carbon or low alloy steels, the practical and measurable weld benefits are minuscule or often the figment of a weld equipment marketing managers imagination.

2008: PULSED EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND TRADITIONAL WELD MODES. The ability to provide a logical, unbiased weld process application comparison of the pulsed mode benefits and disadvantages, against the benefits and disadvantages of the traditional MIG short circuit, globular and spray transfer modes, is what should make the selection of pulsed equipment either a success or failure for many welding shops.




UNQUALIFIED WELD EQUIPMENT EVALUATIONS,
ARE AS COMMON AS HANDS OFF MANAGERS.

WELDING SKILLS ARE ONE THING. WELDERS, ENGINEERS, SUPERVISORS AND TECHNICIANS WHO LACK WELD PROCESS CONTROL EXPERTISE AND THEN TRY TO EVALUATE A WELD PROCESS OR WELD CONSUMABLE, ARE SURE TO COME UP WITH SOME INTERESTING CHOICES OR COMMENTS THAT WILL HAVE COST CONSEQUENCES.

.





There is a common problem that occurs daily in the welding industry with MIG weld equipment and consumable evaluations. Most manufacturing companies employ welding individuals that may have extensive "welding skills" however few companies have employees that have the in-depth "MIG weld process / consumable expertise" necessary to evaluate MIG equipment, weld transfer modes and consumables.

Managers: If the employees in your shop "play around" with the MIG equipment and weld parameters, how do you expect them to provide a qualified evaluation of new MIG welding equipment or consumables?






WHY DO SO MANY COMPANIES STARVE THEMSELVES FROM GOOD PROCESS CONTROL TRAINING RESOURCES? When you go into the supervisors or managers office, look to the shelves for any books or training resources on Robot / Manual MIG / FCAW "Weld Process Controls". You won't find any as, they are here in my office ready and waiting to be shipped out.

.



<2006: WELD EQUIPMENT COSTS AND DURABILITY CONCERNS?


It's an ironic fact, that today in many weld shops that use pulsed equipment, the shop manager or maintenance supervisor may think the pulsed equipment is doing great, that is if it only breaks down once a year, or it lasts through it's 36 month warranty. In contrast a typical, traditional, lower cost CV MIG power source, should last at least 15 years before Fred the electrician and Joe the millwright in the the maintenance department to take a look inside it.


.

CONCERN FOR SO THE CALLED WELD VARIABLES: As mentioned in section one, with pulsed weld procedures we have more than wire feed rates and weld voltage to be concerned with. A slight change in the pulsed peak, background current, pulsed frequency, pulsed width, or wave forms and the influence on the weld energy (weld fusion) and weld plasma can be considerable.

Pulsed Welding and Essential Variables. All primary pulsed weld parameters will have a dramatic impact on the weld quality. Each pulsed power source typically will have it's own "unique built in weld schedules" and you can almost guarantee each weld schedule on each pulsed power source will typically provides a different way to weld that simple 3/16 or 1/4 steel fillet weld.

.

"Essential weld variables have a place" in a weld procedure should be adhered to if welding nuclear or any critical welded components. However when robot welding that sad looking Ford truck frame with it's 1 to 4 mm weld gaps, who with a logical mind would give a dam about essential pulsed weld variables.

.


"Weld Essential Variables" and weld quality control will have little meaning in many auto / truck plants where management weld process ownership is lacking and;

[] best weld practices are none existent,
[] weld process controls have no meaning,
[] design tolerances are a joke,
[] weld process control training is none existent.

2008. It's ironic that most weld equipment manufactures do not appear to be in the least concerned about developing a "uniform pulsed weld process" so uniform global pulsed weld process procedures can be implemented.


When manufacturing companies, and also the North American and European weld code committees give the ever evolving, electronic pulsed MIG equipment subject some consideration, (after two decades of ignoring the issues) its important you always remember the following weld equipment, marketing and sales driven bottom line.

2008: Each year, pulsed equipment manufacturers will continually strive to make their top end weld equipment "electronically unique" with the addition of more and more unnecessary bells and whistles. The weld reality is, what applies to one pulsed power source will typically not apply to another. The standard, simple, universal, two parameter CV short circuit and spray transfer weld procedures which have been practical, logical and effective for more than five decades, are slowly becoming meaningless as the heavilly marketed pulsed MIG process takes root.


.


In a time when "product liability"
are two words that should make every engineer and weld manager cringe, it's rather strange that few Ford manufacturing managers or engineers seem concerned with daily maintaining the fundamental, uniform weld process qualifications and procedures for their welded parts.


The above was taken from a 1990s report delivered by Ed, to the engineers and management at one of the largest Ford plants in Detroit. Note: As common with all the big three plants, this type of report and criticism quickly gets tossed into the garbage pail.

.

.

2008. All the big auto / truck manufacturers and their tier suppliers have spent hundreds of millions on ISO compliance and lean manufacturing methods, yet the weld reality is few of these companies will employ managers or engineers who will spend a few hours in trying to understand the manufacturing equipment utilized on the shop floors. Even fewer will be aware of the requirements to establish MIG and flux cored Weld Best Practices or how to implement manual / automated Weld Process Controls.

It's not just the unnecessary pulsed MIG equipment complexity and price that should be an issue at many plants, the less durable pulsed equipment brings it's own concerns. After more than two decades of MIG pulsed product development, some weld equipment manufactures have finally built an electronic pulsed MIG power source which has enabled them to extend the pulsed weld equipment warranty from 12 to 36 months.

Are you aware that your repair costs on that Lincoln Power Wave could readily reach $4000 to $5000. For the cost of the pulsed equipment repair you could buy two new Lincoln CV 400's, and do the same quality carbon steel welds and not touch the power sources for the next two decades.

.

.

.


MID 1990s: THE JAPANESE, PANASONIC PULSED ~~~RIPPLE~~~ STORY.

If one true weld tale represents the BS that has surrounded the pulsed process, it's this Panasonic pulsed equipment story. A few years ago a Panasonic rep approached Airgas the company I worked for. Airgas is the largest global weld supply company. Panasonic wanted Airgas to represent their so called, unique pulsed product line for the USA market.

It was my job at Airgas to evaluate MIG equipment and select equipment to be sold by the Airgas distributors. The Panasonic rep sat in my office, and for two hours described the wonderful feature benefits of his superior electronic pulsed power source. I listened as the enthusiastic rep showed me his oscilloscope photographs and informed me how his unique MIG power source had "smoothed out the traditional power source output ripple effect" The "ripples" I was told, occurred with a regular MIG CV power source. While the Panasonic rep showed me his ripples, I thought it was interesting that he did did not show the weld current and voltage out put.

What a fool I had been. I have been around MIG welding since 1961 and did not realize I needed ~~~"Ripple Proof Welds" ~~~

The ripple photos were taken from an oscilloscope screen, (please don't confuse ripples with weld current and amps) . The rep then went over the pulsed power source, numerous electronic features. He was really impressed with the fact that the pulsed power source provided "self diagnosis" of its electronic ailments. In other words his pulsed power source shuts down if the weld output deviates from the information put in.

I told the Panasonic rep to send one of the welding units to my companies training department in Chicago. At this location I could compare the pulsed equipment along side a regular 450 amp, CV power source from Miller. This Delta Weld 450, was a MIG power source that unfortunately and unknowingly provided the "inconsistent ~~~ripple output effect~~~ . At the same time I knew the Delta Weld was the world's best CV MIG power source.


The Panasonic unit sat in the training facilities three weeks before I could test it. The reason for the delay was the power source with it's intelligent self diagnosis feature, shut itself down on three separate occasions. To add to it's misery the poor Japanese power source would not restart after the third shut down. To restart the Panasonic power source we had to bring in the MIG equipment specialist from Panasonic.




Finally after flying in half the Japanese population and many wonderful lunches in local Japanese restaurant, Panasonic got it's state of the art MIG power source running. The power source was fixed, and it actually stayed on after switching it on.

I then invited the Panasonic rep to demonstrate his unique pulsed equipment. As with all MIG equipment evaluations I provided steel and stainless weld samples that were 1/16 - 1/8 - 3/16 - 1/4- 1/2 (1.6 - 3.3 - 5 - 6.4 -13 mm). This steel thickness range represents the majority of North America's bread and butter steel welding applications.

The Panasonic welding package presented at that time for the test sold for approximately three times the cost of a regular MIG power source. The Panasonic Japanese weld team and electronic power source team went head to head with myself and the trusty blue Miller Delta-Weld. As Paul Harvey likes to state on his radio show, "well now for the rest of the story".

On every weld I made, the less costly, the more durable Delta-Weld was easier and quicker to set, and from a weld quality and productivity perspective the Delta Weld easily out performed the Panasonic. After all the welds were complete, the Panasonic rep spluttered a few Midwest words I usually only hear in welding shops, and left looking for another ~~~rippless North America sucker~~~. Note: They found many.

Mid 1990s. The Panasonic Chicago test was my first introduction in the USA to a Japanese MIG pulsed power source, and my first introduction to the appalling lack of Japanese weld process expertise. This solid weld equipment test was the reason why Panasonic did not at that time get its weld product line into Airgas, the world's largest weld distributor.

As the Panasonic power source manufacturer believes their product represents one of the most sophisticated electronic state of the art pulsed MIG power sources sold in the USA, I thought I would spend some time seeing what the 1999 pulsed Panasonic HM 500 power source had to offer. The 99 AWS weld show provided the opportunity. The following is not word for word but it is does represent the fundamental content of my conversation with the Panasonic rep.

.


The Panasonic ~~~ Pulsed ~~~
BS Saga Continues.




When I asked the Panasonic rep to describe his new HM 500 pulsed power source at the 1999 AWS show, the conversation that followed was quite interesting.

A Panasonic rep at the weld show who did not know me said:

"
Ed our new, dip pulsed power source is really unique, it provides "artificial intelligence" and many electronic benefits. The power source is constantly analyzing the pulsed arc output weld data and making parameter corrections for the arc. This power source provides superior penetration to any other pulsed power source. (This guy did not mention ripples).


The Panasonic sales rep continues.


"Ed you may not be aware that after the Kobe earth quake in Japan, weld penetration became a prime issue (I guess in Japan weld penetration was not a concern before the earth quake) . He continued, "one of the things that effects pulsed weld penetration is when the pulsed arc length changes, if the arc length, (the distance between the wire tip and weld) is shortened, the pulsed weld drop is not allowed to form without interruption, This weld drop interruption and weld transfer inconsistency would effect the consistency of the weld fusion attained.

At this stage of the one way weld conversation from the Panasonic rep, by the way this kid looked like he had just graduated from high school. His comments left me speechless, which for me on the subject of welding is really unusual. For the last three decades, in ten different countries I have set thousands of different MIG weld applications always with a focus on attaining optimum weld fusion with maximum weld deposition. The welds I produced could pass any code weld spec and were all carried out with traditional, durable low cost CV MIG equipment. The readers may want to note, that in the last forty plus years, I have never had a MIG weld quality or weld fusion issue.

It's a pity it took an earthquake in Japan before some Japanese weld equipment manufacturer became concerned about weld fusion.

An ironic weld point. If the Panasonic equipment and the MIG and flux cored process had been used for structural steel applications used in seismic locations, in contrast to traditional CV equipment and argon mixes, there is no doubt in my mind that the Panasonic equipment would produce inferior weld quality with extensive lack of weld fusion issues.

.

.



When welding salesmen start to talk in a
language unfamiliar to you, take three
steps back, say good buy and get on with your life.




This was an oscilloscope Volt / Amp reading of a Panasonic Power
source taken shortly after the Big Ripple and "Constant Weld Fusion" di
scussion.

Volts Red. Weld Current Black.

.

.

The following is an oscilloscope of weld voltage and current from a traditional CV power source that cost 200% less than the Panasonic power source
with it's magic ripples.

Volts Red Current Black.

.



PERHAPS PANASONIC PERSONNEL SHOULD HAVE BEEN EDUCATED AS TO WHY THE REGULAR MIG PROCESS
WITH SPRAY AND SHORT CIRCUIT TRANSFER, HAS BEEN SO EFFECTIVE FOR 50 YEARS.

.

The regular, low cost MIG power source, provides that unique constant voltage (CV) attribute, in which the MIG power source instantly make its own weld current correction for a wire stick-out variation.

With CV equipment, weld voltage and current variations should be minuscule, during a robot weld in which the wire stick out variations should be minimal. With MIG welding, even a novice will understand the importance of stable weld current and voltage.







.

It's interesting to note that the Panasonic rep placed concern on the negative attributes of a short arc length with the pulsed process and the negative impact on the weld fusion potential. In contrast, the regular spray mode plasma and weld stream has much less sensitivity to arc length variations and provides more consistent weld fusion. I did not get into this discussion with the Panasonic rep, it would have been time wasted. To try and rectify brain washing or process ignorance takes extensive time, and I only had one hour with this guy. In my mind, I instead gave him a pat on his head and sent him back to his Japanese MIG master.



[] Japan is a country that for decades used straight CO2 for most of it's globular, spatter covered MIG welds.

[] Japan is a country that lacked gas plants that could make argon mixes to enable controlled spray transfer.


[] Japan is a country that for decades lacked knowledge about MIG Spray Transfer mode that comes with using argon mixed gases.


At the same show, I asked another Panasonic rep a simple question about the "pulsed wire feed range potential". I said, "can your intelligent power source provide a practical measurable benefit like extending the traditional MIG spray wire feed range so that robots can weld faster? The Panasonic rep instantly developed my wife's weld glazed blank look. He replied finally with an answer that made sense. He stated "he was not qualified to answer", and he handed me over to his technician.

The technician was ready to demonstrate his latest Panasonic Power source with an 0.052 (1.4 mm) carbon steel wire. I asked that the weld wire be set at a common, "high spray transfer" setting of 420 in./min. This setting would be used to weld a 6 - 8 mm fillet welds on > 9 mm plate. As I expected, at the wire feed rate of 420 in./min, the pulsed plasma was highly agitated and digging. The pulsed plasma was simply unsuited for a controlled weld. I of course wondered how it was possible that the Panasonic reps and technicians were "qualified to discuss the influence of highly complex, artificial intelligence" on the MIG arcs weld characteristics, yet they did not know a simple limitation on the MIG pulsed wire feed range capability.

For five decades, Japan with no argon mixes had MIG welded with straight CO2 and the resulting erratic, globular weld transfer, daily created a welding mess. In the nineteen nineties, Japanese companies like Panasonic went from boom boxes and TV manufacturing to try to make sophisticated welding equipment. The Japanese made poor, erratic, pulsed MIG equipment which they attached it to their robots and brought this package to the USA, a country that for more than five decades had provided most of the world's best MIG equipment.

When it came to MIG welds, Asian auto giants like Toyota and Honda employed engineers that experienced welding the Japanese way which was first you MIG weld then you grind, with typically more grinding than welding. Panasonic a prime supplier to these companies came to America with electronic MIG equipment that could barely function, equipment that provided zero weld benefits and created numerous weld and robot issues. How did America respond to the Japanese weld equipment? The apathetic North American manufacturing management, led by auto / truck industry weld decision makers, (an industry also notorious for it's bad welds) opened the door, and said if it's Japanese it must be good, so come on in.



© Nov. 2007: THE PULSED ACHILLES HEEL: Even with the world's best pulsed equipment, when welding many common applications, the Pulsed MIG process will always have it's Achilles Heel.
This web site is the only place in the industrial world where you will read the following negative point on pulsed MIG welding. Please note the copy right symbols are in place for a reason.

With the formation of each pulsed MIG weld drop, the fluctuating pulsed MIG arc plasma, goes from a "narrow to wide plasma profile". The pulsed MIG plasma changes are of course influenced by the back ground to peak current changes. With the low back ground current, for a micro second you have much less ionization taking place in the plasma zone.

In contrast. The traditional spray transfer, will provide a more constant, cone shaped, plasma profile. Improving the ionization stability and maintaining the surface area of a MIG arc plasma enables the following;

[] More consistent electron transfer from the negative weld surface to the positive wire tip. Useful in improving arc stability especially in automated high weld speed applications and also in maintaining consistent weld fusion.


[] Improving the density and coverage of an arc plasma improves oxide surface removal. Also adds to arc stability. Beneficial on mill scale / coated applications and on those single pass welds larger that 7 mm.

[] A consistent, denser wide plasma also provides wider distribution of weld heat.
Improves weld fusion profiles, especially over the length of the side wall weld fusion on fillet welds.

Of course pulsed works well on many applications yet anyone who has used the process on a wide range of applications is aware that it's a process that can cause issues on many welds. When you add the pulsed arc instability that is common from many pulsed power sources, with the fluctuating pulsed plasma, you can understand why in two decades I went into hundreds of companies around the globe and switched the pulsed mode off and changed the arc back to spray. Changing wave forms does not change the Achilles Heel.



"The welds produced should always be
mightier than the weld sales reps word"

.

.

<2005: Pulsed MIG equipment in America's farmlands. What was
the engineer who made that equipment decision smoking?


.

.

.

<2004. I was really surprised at a visit to a large manufacturing plant in the middle of the corn fields of the mid west, to find that the plant had purchased a large number of Panasonic, pulsed welding machines to weld carbon steel, farm and related equipment.

I mention the mid west, because in this part of the US, you will typically find a few hard working, workers like welders and supervisors who weld during the grave yard shift, then take care of their small farms during the day.

You might ask, how is it that practical, rational Mid West people can get sucked into purchasing costly, Japanese Panasonic bells and whistles for welding thin gage to 1/2 (12mm) carbon steel farm equipment applications? These applications have been successfully MIG welded by Deere, Massey Ferguson, Caterpillar and Harvester for the last 50 years using less costly, easy to operate, more durable North American MIG welding equipment.


More cost effective, greater productivity, practical, logical, easier to use, greater durability and no bull. These are the words that people in the mid west used to like to hear.

These were not the words used when a John Deere weld engineer made what I think was an illogical and costly weld process decision. In the nineteen nineties this man converted his organization over to over priced, poor performing, low durability pulsed MIG equipment. (Can you remember in the nineties how unstable computers were? well pulsed equipment was much worse). To add insult to mid west logic, the weld engineer made the MIG equipment conversion based on "weld smoke reduction".

I hope we are all aware that when MIG welding carbon steel applications, the weld smoke from traditional MIG with argon 10 - 20 % CO2 mixes has never been an industrial safety or work issue. I believe it would have been more logical and beneficial to his company's bottom line, if this weld decision maker had instead focused on his products weld fusion potential, arc stability and weld deposition rate potential.

.

A FLAW WITH MANY TECHNICAL PEOPLE, IS THEY DON'T WANT TO SPEND MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES ON A SUBJECT, AND WHEN THEY WANT TECHNICAL ADVICE THEY WON'T THINK TWICE ABOUT ASKING A SALESMAN.

.

2008: Is it possible that this computer driven, we have to have it now generation of weld shop decision makers is enamored by electronics or just completely screwed up.

In many of the weld shops I deal with, I will often meet robot weld technicians, many of them just out of high school. Many, (not all) of these young guys will have spent five minutes reading a Lincoln or Miller glossy sales brochure on a new artificial MIG power source, and bingo they become welding experts. You have met these guys, these are the new weld experts that would much rather give you their highly qualified opinion on the welds, rather then spend five minutes listening to some one who was MIG welding a decade before they were born.




The Miller & Airco Pulsed MIG Fiasco.

.

To be fair, it's not just the Japanese pulsed equipment manufacturers that stretched the MIG welding truth, for god's sake, you would never want to place a bible in front of Lincoln or Miller corporate personnel and ask them to tell the truth and nothing but the whole truth on their pulsed MIG equipment issues. It's also fair to state that in the mid eighties if you had purchased a US made Airco pulsed power source, (a company that once had pride in its MIG equipment performance) you would have got more from your money if you had placed the money in a paper bag and burnt it.


1980s early 1990s. A common problem that occurred with the Airco pulsed equipment, was apart from the fact that the pulsed mode was simply useless, also the printed circuit board that controlled the pulsed parameters would frequently malfunction.

In many cases the Airco pulsed circuit board failures would occur not long after the power source was delivered or even during the delivery. Many weld shops who had purchased the Airco pulsed power source, would use the pulsed equipment for years without being aware that the pulsed control boards were shot. The actual pulsed weld transfer mode that resulted from the faulty boards produced an erratic globular / spray transfer. A condition that many of the weld shops believed was normal pulsed. Of course Airco never informed the customers about the board problem.

Its another sad reflection of an industry who uses MIG equipment, to find that there are few welding personnel who can look at a weld transfer and know the difference between globular, spray, short circuit and pulsed transfer.

If you were one of those unfortunate companies that purchased either the Miller, Airco or Lincoln pulsed power sources, the best thing you could have done was either sent the equipment back or sued the power source manufacturer for selling you weld equipment that negatively impacted your companies ability to produce consistent weld quality.

.

.

.

MILLER ELECTRIC:
PROCESS IGNORANCE, EQUIPMENT ISSUES DENIAL AND EXAGGERATED
PULSED WELD CLAIMS WERE GENERATED FOR APPROX. TWO DECADES.




THE 1980s. THE CANADIAN TECHNICAL COLLEGE AND THE MILLER PULSED WELDING FIASCO:
In the nineteen eighties, the largest community college in Vancouver, BC, was one of the first locations in western Canada to purchase Miller's first pulsed power source, the very costly Miller Pulstar.

The Miller Pulstar power source cost the equivalent of four regular CV. MIG units. The college was exited about it's so called high tech, weld equipment acquisition and it's trip into a new weld technology.

A month after the pulsed weld equipment purchase, the college realized it could not get the power source to do anything out of the ordinary. At the time the college was finding a little pulsed reality, I was the Western Canada weld training manager for Linde, (Union Carbide, Praxair, ESAB, what ever). As Miller had not been able to provide for the college weld instructors, any weld benefits from their pulsed power source, the community college asked if I could come to Vancouver and show the weld instructors how to set the pulsed equipment for all position welds.


In this time period, an exaggerated claim made by the global pulsed weld equipment manufacturers for the justification of the costly pulsed equipment, was in contrast to traditional CV MIG equipment, the pulsed equipment was supposed to be able to produce acceptable "vertical up" pulsed MIG welds on carbon / stainless steels.

With the Miller Pulstar, I decided to set the process for a vertical up pulsed MIG fillet weld. To attain the pulsed vert up fillet, I set the Miller power source at every possible pulsed frequency, wire feed, and weld voltage combination. The bottom line, it was impossible to produce an acceptable, simple vertical up ,1/4 (6 mm) pulsed MIG fillet weld, with the costly Miller Pulstar.

2008: Note: Talk about premature product introduction. It took Miller another 20 plus years before Miller made pulsed equipment suited to weld that vertical up fillet weld and the ironic point is, pulsed MIG in 2008, when used for all position welds, is inferior to the gas shielded flux cored wires used with low cost CV equipment...



With this Miller pulsed equipment
Miller could have made this claim
.

USE THE MILLER PULSED EQUIPMENT AND
INCREASE YOUR WELD LABOR AND WELD EQUIPMENT COSTS.


When using the Miller Pulstar and welding with the pulsed mode in the flat and horizontal weld positions, numerous companies that purchased this costly equipment were not aware of the cost consequences of the erratic pulsed transfer or of the "low recommended pulsed wire feed rates" they had to use.

<2006. IF WELD SHOPS HAD MORE AWARENESS OF THEIR WIRE FEED AND WELD DEPOSITION RELATIONSHIPS FOR THE COMMON WELD APPLICATIONS, THEY WOULD THINK TWICE BEFORE PURCHASING THAT PULSED EQUIPMENT.

< 2006: Many companies using recommended pulsed parameters found when welding in the flat or horizontal weld positions, that the optimum, pulsed parameters resulted in wire feed rates that were twenty to forty percent lower than the wire feed rates they could have attained from the traditional lower cost MIG equipment and using the traditional spray transfer mode.


THIS MILLER BEAUTY MADE ME A LOT OF MONEY:


For many years after the introduction of the useless Miller Pulstar, I traveled across North America visiting weld shops and switching the useless pulsed mode off. With a little process training I brought the unfortunate pulsed customers back to spray transfer that enabled the weld shops to best utilize that costly Miller MIG equipment. Come to think about it, I don't believe I ever recieved a thank you card from Miller for this service.




Out of the frying pan into the fire.

.

After the Miller Pulstar Fiasco, along
came the Miller "Maxtron"

.
For the first time in its history Miller was embarrassed by its MIG weld equipment and the Miller Pulstar had to be put down. The next pulsed package from Miller was the infamous, electronic "Maxtron". I liked to call it Mad Max.

I believe that the Maxtron's claim to fame, was apart from the utilization of more electronics, this power source mad
e a lot of money for weld equipment repair shops, especially those repair shops who liked the novelty of CHARGING A PREMIUM for working on new, clean, weld equipment failures.

The Miller Maxtron power source and all other pulsed equipment in this time frame, made weld equipment repair shops wake up to the fact that they had better get their weld equipment repair employees better trained on dealing with circuit board failures. These companies also realized that fixing the new electronic MIG equipment was going to be a very lucrative business.


Remember before the introduction of faulty pulsed equipment, Miller had a reputation as one of the world's most reliable MIG weld equipment manufactures. If you had purchased a Miller Maxtron and it was not in the repair shop, you would have learnt with use, that the poor quality of the preprogrammed pulsed weld data in the weld schedules, was in reality an indication of the lack of weld process knowledge of the responsible Miller personnel who designed and developed the Maxtron.

Constant voltage power sources have traditionally lasted ten to twenty years. In contrast, the Maxtron as mentioned often had electronic issues ten to twenty weeks after it was delivered. Like it's predecessor, Miller decided that Mad Max should be put to sleep and painfully withdrawn from the market.


The Maxtron was replaced with a third pulsed attempt from Miller, a power source called the "Invision". From my perspective, it was a vision without a future.

The Inconsistent Invision was another Miller power source that came to welding shops before it was ready. This was a power source many weld shops paid a steep price for the automated, inconsistent pulsed weld performance.

1980s to 2005. It was obvious that the global pulsed equipment manufacturers were having a difficult time trying to identify practical, cost effective weld benefits for none pipe, carbon steel pulsed applications.

2005: It's still evident that many of the engineers who design pulsed welding equipment understand little about arc physics, weld requirements, weld process comparisons and weld process application considerations.
However as mentioned in the equipment section after two decades one or two companies are showing some progress with their pulsed MIG equipment.
.


Feb 2004. Location. A message from The Miller Electric web site. The Miller product manager describes the new Miller Acupulse and makes the following statements.

" Miller pulsed equipment developed during the last decade was limited to the electronics that were available and cost effective at the time". As part of their process control feedback loop, the pulsed MIG equipment would sample the voltage value once per period, (a period being one cycle of peak and background current, one weld drop). If a short circuit occurs of the drop, the detection may not happen for nearly a full period. During that time, the wire electrode becomes buried in the puddle and takes a fair amount of current to clear. To clear the short circuit and restart the arc, an increased current level is used. This current tends to "punch" the puddle and cause excessive weld puddle agitation, adding to both arc instability and weld spatter.
.
Note from Ed: It's nice in 2004 for Miller to finally admit about "one" their many pulsed electronic problems, especially after almost two decades of selling "arc instability." If the Miller pulsed equipment was known to not work correctly, (I seemed to be the only one complaining about it for those decades) why was it sold to welding shops? Why was the faulty pulsed equipment not recalled? Why was it that the companies who purchased this faulty equipment and had extensive weld issues, did not sue Miller for their quality issues or lost weld production?

|



BIG TROUBLE FROM BIG RED.

If you want to make your weld life more expensive, more complex and less meaningful than it needs to be you could listen to the Lincoln reps, then purchase the pulsed MIG, Lincoln PowerWave:

.

ED. WE JUST NEED TO PULSED MIG WELD A MILLION AXLES EACH YEAR:

<1999: My weld task appeared simple. A a tier one, axle manufacture located in Michigan ordered two robot systems to weld truck axles. The company I worked for supplied the robots, we were also responsible for setting up the robot cells that would provide one million axles annually. When the robot cells were complete, we were required to provide approx. 5000 welded axles as part of the robot cell run off.

The axle manufacture had previously utilized the traditional Lincoln CV. 400 to 600 amp MIG units. This equipment using the spray transfer mode had never created any serious weld quality or productivity issues. A weld engineer at the axle manufacturer who listened to Lincoln's advice was responsible for the selection of the Lincoln pulsed Power Wave weld equipment. The carbon steel, MIG wire selected by the axle manufacturer was 0.052 (1.4mm).

Two factors were critical for the axle pulsed weld project:

[1] The axle fillet weld sizes must never be smaller than a 1/4 (6mm).

[2] As the annual axle production was a million plus units, every second used on the robot weld cycle time was considered critical.


TRADITIONAL WELDING METHOD: The axle manufacture had produced axles for decades. With the regular MIG CV equipment. The axles were welded with an 0.052 (1.4mm) MIG wire and an argon CO2 mix. The CV equipment used spray transfer to weld the 1/4 (6mm) fillet welds at typical robot weld travel speeds of 20 to 22 in./min. My first objective with the Lincoln PowerWave and pulsed mode and the 0.052 wire, was to try to attain the same travel (production) rates as that previously attained.


PULSED AND DEPOSITION RATES:
When setting the Lincoln pulsed PowerWave weld data, to attain the desired weld speeds, I had to set the 0.052 (1.4mm) pulsed wire feed rate at approx. 420 in./min. This wire feed rate is considered the high end of traditional spray transfer for an 0.052 wire.

Using regular MIG spray transfer and traditional CV MIG equipment, a MIG wire feed rate of 420 inch/min was used with the 0.052 (1.4 mm) carbon steel MIG wires. This procedure had been used by the axle manufacture successfully for many years.

This traditional CV weld equipment, sells in the USA for $3000 to $4000. This equipment was very durable and successful and had hardly changed in more than four decades.

.
The Lincoln PowerWave Dilemma

It was evident when I was setting the Lincoln Power Wave, that the pulsed equipment did not respond well to the 0.052 wire and the 420 in./min wire feed settings. The resulting high energy, pulsed arc plasma was both "narrow and intense" resulting in a weld arc plasma that caused a "deep penetrating (digging) effect" on the axle welds.

The first big news that came from the high Powe Wave pulsed settings, was with the robot weld travel rates attained. At a weld speeds of 20-22 inch/min, I ended up with an external fillet weld profile that measured only 3/16 (4.8mm). When the 3/16 fillet weld was cut and a macro evaluation of the internal weld profile provided, it revealed that the intense, narrow pulsed plasma had caused the weld to penetrate almost threes times greater than traditional MIG spray penetration, so you end up with a smaller, visible weld profile.

To get the deep penetrating, undersize fillet weld to an acceptable 1/4 fillet weld size, the robot, pulsed weld travel rate would have to be reduced to a travel rate of 15 - 17 in./min. This 25% reduction in weld travel rate would have a huge impact on the axle weld cycle time, remember every second lost was multiplied by a million axles. I went through all the possible external Power Wave pulsed parameter adjustments, however I could not change the intensity or the profile of the pulsed MIG weld plasma at the 420 inch/min wire feed rates we had to use.
I reluctantly contacted Lincoln. The reason I was reluctant to contact Lincoln was simple, a life time of dealing with Lincoln had provided me with thick skin, an allergy to BS and an attitude of little expectations. I was not disappointed.



Lincoln with its reputation on the line, flew in one of their brighter weld engineers. The engineer arrived with his laptop in tow. Its a sad state of affairs when to fix a weld someone believes they need a computer.


I demonstrated to the Lincoln engineer how at the required 420 inch/min wire feed rate, the resulting pulsed plasma from the PowerWave was "too narrow and too intense" for the thick wall steel axle application. The Lincoln young engineer, who by the way looked like he was just out of high school, smiled and assured this old fart that one of the prime features of the PowerWave was that with the assistance of his unique lap top software, he could change the power source wave forms to suit the application. I smiled back at him, and said "good luck son".

To perform the test welds for the Lincoln rep, I provided the engineer with a long piece of 3/8 (9 mm) carbon steel plate. I had the plate surface ground. I let the engineer know that when his power source could place a robot butt weld on the surface of this 3/8 plate using the 0.052 wire without providing an unacceptable digging crater and undercut effect, then his work was done.

Two days later, his over worked lap top had provided every possible combination of pulsed weld parameters and wave forms. With the 0.052 wire feed rate set at 420 ipm, the high energy, digging pulsed arc plasma still remained narrow and too intense for the axle application.

The red faced Lincoln rep was frustrated with his red power source. No longer smiling, he packed his computer and left. He did promise make a Hollywood promise that "his people" would look into the situation and get back to us. Over the years, when dealing with Lincoln welding issues I had heard this "will get back to you, canned response promise" many times. Of course his people never got back to us. Lets face it, a duck is always a duck and a bull is always a bull.

I had hoped while trying to set those pulsed welds, that the young Lincoln engineer had absorbed a weld fact that I had known while he was still in his mothers womb. Pulsed welding equipment may offer millions of wave forms, however as with all weld transfer modes the pulsed mode provides a limited optimum weld parameter range for a specific wire diameter.

The pulsed weld parameter range has both wire feed and peak frequency / peak current limitations. For a given wire diameter the resulting average weld current attained from the peak and back ground current cannot typically exceed the maximum current utilized for traditional spray transfer.

Fundamental arc physics: Irrespective of the potential wave form configurations from a power source, there are only so many electrons that can be squeezed into a MIG wire and across an arc. Also to attain optimum weld fusion on a specific steel thickness, the weld wire size and wire feed rate must provide a specific voltage, current and weld travel rate.This is of course a fundamental weld fact, however the wave form ~~~ crowd ~~~ often will place more faith in wave forms than they do with weld logic.

.


No Wave Forms, just a Perfect Weld
from Low Cost, CV, MIG Equipment.




With the MIG CV spray process, a stable, optimum, cone shaped weld plasma is produced. The cone shaped plasma provides wide, consistent coverage of the weld area.

When
using pulsed MIG and large diameter MIG wires like 0.052, (1.4mm) and the requirement is high wire feed rates > 400 inch/min, you will be achieving deposition rates > 14 lb/hr. When using this data its likely you will be welding on steels > 8 mm. For this application a typical spray weld current range of 380- 450 amps would be required. With the pulsed mode, a very high peak current and pulsed frequency is required to provide sufficient energy for the high deposition weld. The resulting high peak pulsed parameters will result in a narrow, concentrated energy, agitated pulsed plasma. This plasma may have more in common with a plasma cutting arc than it does with a controlled MIG welding arc.



THE LINCOLN ENGINEER LEFT US WITH A PULSED MIG WAVE FORM THAT CREATED AN ARC AND PLASMA THAT HAD MORE IN COMMON WITH THE PLASMA CUTTING PROCESS, THAN THAT WITH A CONTROLLED MIG WELDING ARC.



As the down cast Lincoln engineer walked towards the plant exit with his lap top looking less important, I who have little patience for the universal, sales induced, bovine fecal weld matter that daily saturates this industry, and being a pragmatic, thick skinned Manchurian, (means born in Manchester. UK) decided to pour a little salt on his wounds.

I asked the Lincoln rep, "don't you think it's a little ridiculous that at the end of the day, your costly Power Wave provides inferior weld results than your traditional DC 400 amp MIG power source that cost a third of the price?
The Lincoln rep did not reply to my question, he just shrugged his sagging shoulders as he left the building.


SOME REAL WORLD WELD BENEFITS FOR THE 1 MILLION A YEAR AXLE APPLICATION: The lower cost, traditional Lincoln CV. DC. 400 amp power source, or a Miller Delta Weld power source used on this axle application would produce spray transfer welds with superior weld fusion profiles, less weld quality issues and 20% faster weld speeds.

.

THE LINCOLN POWER WAVE SAGA CONTINUED WHEN WELD CRACKS OCCURRED IN THE AXLE WELDS.

After the Lincoln rep left we went back to using a lower pulsed setting for the 1/4 (6 mm) fillet welds. A few axles were then pulsed welded with the Power Wave at the low robot weld travel rates of 17 ipm.

Attention was now focussed on the Ford weld specification for the truck axles. The weld spec required a "macro examination" of a specific amount of axle fillet welds. A measurement of the internal fillet weld cross section was required to ensure the minimum weld throat dimensions were being attained.

In evaluating the Lincoln Power Wave weld cross sections from the axle pulsed welds. I noticed even at the lower pulsed settings the penetration was still deep and narrow and "center weld hot cracks" had occurred in more than 20 % of the axle weld samples we tested.

.



Due to the narrow, pulsed deep weld penetration profiles and restrained high
tensile steel weld joints, we were getting classic "hot cracks" in the axle welds.

.

As we had minimal weld test equipment at the robot company, I had the University of Colorado metallurgy department verify that the axle weld cracks did result from the poor pulsed weld profile. They provided written confirmation.

The center weld cracks were not a surprise from the Lincoln Power Wave pulsed welds as I had previously complained to the axle company management about the poor pulsed weld depth to width ratios and predicted the weld cracking issue.

Before we produced any more axles I notified my management, who then notified the axle manufacture management of the pulsed production and weld crack issues. We informed American Axle that the use of the Lincoln Power Wave pulsed mode would result in deep, narrow weld fusion, and this poor weld profile combined with the high strength steels and restrained weld joints was a classic set up for potential hot center cracks. At this time I requested to call a hold on the project.

The robot project manager and I flew to Michigan where we had a meeting with the American Axle corporate management and the responsible engineers. I explained to these personnel that their choice of the Lincoln Pulsed PowerWave, and the pulsed weld parameters utilized were creating weld cracks and reducing the axle cycle times by approx. 25% . I explained that if they complained about the Power Wave weld equipment to Lincoln, I believed Lincoln would have no choice but to exchange the four Power Wave power sources for their conventional CV. MIG equipment. If the axle company would make the power source change we could get the desired weld cycle times and eliminate future potential weld crack issues and reduce future liability concerns for axle failures. The axle company management thanked us for the data and said they would consider the matter.


WITH MOST ROBOT MIG AND RESISTANCE WELD PROBLEMS, IT'S THE HUMAN ELEMENT THAT'S TYPICALLY THE CAUSE OF MOST WELD ISSUES.



The bottom line: This axle company employed a weld engineer who lacked weld process expertise. He was no different from many of Detroit's engineers who when requiring weld answers, seek out a Lincoln or Miller sales rep. This engineer was now in a difficult position as he did not want to loose face in front of his management.

The Axle company management decided to let the decision stay with their incompetent weld engineer. The engineer would not back down from his Lincoln, Power Wave equipment selection and after we left, he convinced his managers that irrespective of the technical facts and weld crack samples presented, that he had made the right weld equipment choice. The weld equipment decision was made. American Axle stuck with the PowerWaves.

Meanwhile as the axle company could not take immediate delivery of the robots. The robot company I worked for was asked to weld a great number of axles. During this manufacturing period I noted the center weld cracks continued. I left the robot company a short time later.

In 2007 I believe the axles welds to this day are still made with this equipment. American Axle switched the PowerWave pulsed mode off. Maybe the Detroit best selling trucks will die of rust before the axle weld cracks can propagate to failure. Maybe the PowerWave was eventually used with lower pulsed settings that don't cause cracks.

No one I discussed this with seemed to want to take this issue to a higher level, however I happen to be a catholic with a conscience. I sent a registered letter to one of Ford's lawyers in Detroit. In the letter I spelt out my concerns with the axle weld cracks on their trucks. The lawyer or Ford never replied.

Could it be that Ford did not get to hear, or did not want to hear about it's axle weld issues. Is it possible that Ford would rather wait to see how many axles fail on it's trucks and how many life's are lost before it decides what action has to be taken.

There is this weld reality. Many of America's best selling > 1998 trucks will have axle cracks that were caused by management that would not take responsibility for its manufacturing weld problems.



WITH ALL ENGINEERING DECISIONS IT PAYS TO BE OPEN MINDED,
IT ALSO PAYS TO KNOW THE PROCESSES YOU CONTROL.
ONE DAY SOON I WILL WRITE MY LAST BOOK TITLED,

"IMAGINE A WELD SHOP THAT RUNS
WITHOUT THE INFLUENCE OF SALESMEN"




I always try to keep an open mind when evaluating new MIG welding equipment even when its made by Lincoln. When I examine a new MIG power source I look for the following three factors.

[1] Is the power source simple to operate? In contrast to traditional two control CV equipment, is the new welding equipment simpler to operate for the welders?

[2] Is the power source durable and maintenance friendly? In contrast to traditional CV equipment, is the new equipment more durable, and can plant electricians repair the power source?

[3] Will the process utilized, provide higher weld deposition rates or provide any weld advantages? In contrast to traditional CV equipment, can the new weld equipment weld faster, deposit more weld metal, provide superior weld fusion or provide less spatter without impairing weld fusion?



MIG WELD RESEARCH?


In the early eighties I was really enthusiastic about the pulsed MIG research hype that was being fed from the British Weld Institute. In that time period in my naive euphoria for new electronic weld technology and the fact that I was influenced by what I thought was technical, unbiased weld research, I wrote my first pulsed article published in the USA by the Welding Journal. My pulsed article extolled what I thought would be the potential pulsed process weld benefits and the pulsed application potential for the welding industry.

My problem when reading the British weld research papers was I did not doubt the MIG weld process / application expertise of those British weld researchers, after all most of their weld resarch from the 1960s to the 1980s was really out standing. I forgot about the generation X factor, and I should have know better.
In the early eighties, approx. 20 years before electronics that could start to do the task of providing a stable pulsed MIG weld, the British Welding Institute was making extensive claims about the capability of the new pulsed MIG process.


Today, when I look back at that UK research, it makes me wonder if those weld research engineers ever knew what a stable MIG weld looked like, or why the traditional CV spray transfer mode was so unique and beneficial. The bottom line, the exagerated weld process claims that flowed from the Weld Institute created the rush by the naive global MIG equipment manufactures to bring to the market the Pulsed MIG process. Unfortunately for almost two decades this equipment was premature to the extreme and certainly not ready to deliver the practical weld and all position weld benefits envisioned by the 1980s British Welding Institute.


Reviewing Weld Data.

In the welding industry, when a person reads about the benefits of welding equipment or weld consumables, it's often wise to look at the source of the data and don't believe what you read till you
put your weld shield on and check out the weld equipment, weld consumables or the weld data published.

When reading weld articles, be especially cautious if the weld information comes from an author who works for a weld equipment or consumable manufacturer, or if the article is written by some student involved in a university weld research project.

Unfortunately since the 1980s, the majority of so called weld research, has been nothing more than marketing data sponsered by companies who want to promote their products.


 

WITH THE DAILY, COMMON, POOR WELD PROCESS DECISIONS SOMEONE HAS TO PAY THE PRICE:

< 2005: It's like this Doc, I recommended that my company purchase 100 new pulsed power sources to weld our carbon steel applications. Six months later, we now realize that we have not increased weld production. The pulsed weld inconsistency and fusion problems have become major issues. We have no one in our maintenance department that can fix the bloody things, and to "cap it off" (no pun intended doc ) the pulsed equipment cost three times as much as we would normally pay for MIG equipment.

By the way Doc, after the pulsed purchase, I ran over my mother in-laws cat. My wife has left me for my best friend. My 16 year old daughter is pregnant and my son started on drugs, then my bloody teeth started to fall out.


 

<2008: What had the pulsed MIG process done
for the carbon steel welds in your plant?

 

Did the pulsed process "increase" your weld equipment costs?

It should have, pulsed equipment typically costs 100 to 500% more.


Did the pulsed equipment increase the "cost" of the weld equipment repairs?

The weld equipment repair people give a prayer of thanks every day to pulsed equipment manufacturers for their dramatic increase in weld equipment repairs and the extra high profit margins these repairs allow.


In contrast to a traditional CV power source and a separate robot interface used in a robot cell, does that new pulsed power source with its "unique built in robot interface" make it easier for your maintenance department to repair or figure out the equipment problems?

With the pulsed power source your maintenance personnel now have a difficult task to discern is the problem the power source,
the power source built in interface or with the robot?

Of course it was easier with the older units that provided separate, minimal electronics, easier to repair robot interface. Like it or not, few global electricians are qualified or want to work inside the electronically complex pulsed welding equipment.



Instead of your traditional MIG equipment with the two weld controls, did the pulsed equipment make welding easier or more complex?

Pulsed can have many parameter adjustments so course it can be more complex.
With pulsed you have peak current, back ground current, pulsed width, pulsed frequency, weld current, weld voltage or arc trim and wire feed rates.


In contrast to optimum spray parameters from traditional CV equipment, did the pulsed parameters provide superior weld fusion?

The traditional spray transfer from low cost CV MIG equipment provides a weld plasma profile that can provide superior weld fusion profiles on steels > 7 mm thick.


In contrast to spray from traditional CV equipment, did the pulsed equipment and process increase your weld deposition rates?

There is no deposition rate increase in contrast to traditional spray transfer.

Did the pulse process add to your "tip wire burn-back issues"?

As pulsed requires a longer open arc length, this typically results in a shorter wire stick-out from the contac
t tip making pulsed more sensitive to tip wear and wire burn-backs.


In contrast to traditional MIG, is the pulsed mode better on > 4 mm, carbon steel, applications that have mill scale?

Regular spray transfer provides a wider plasma, providing a greater area for cathode spots to transfer more electrons to the wire tip. Regular spray transfer can utilize higher energy (higher CO2 content gas mixes), which provide increased CO2 dissociation (increased plasma energy) and increased weld voltage both of which are beneficial for mill scale issues.



Is the pulsed process more sensitive to weld porosity formation than regular spray transfer?

With many pulsed applications, the weld energy is typically less than that derived from the more constant energy
traditional spray transfer mode. On many applications the pulsed process will increase the weld porosity potential.


Is the pulsed mode more or less sensitive to arc blow than your regular CV spray transfer mode?

The pulsed process typically will have more arc blow concerns. Pulsed has longer arc length requirements. A low pulsed frequency and low back ground current will increase the sensitivity to arc blow.


Did you realize for each different manufacturers pulsed power source you purchase you will require a separate weld procedure?

Few companies do. Writing and adhering to pulsed weld procedures will be more complex than most shops realize.
If one of the many pulsed parameters are changed, as they are all essential variables, this should require a new weld procedure?

The pulsed mode at a given frequency and during the pulsed peak current detaches a small weld drop for each pulse. This video is not pulsed, it's regular MIG transfer, with the weld parameters set at the start of the spray transfer transition zone. However if you want to see a weld drop fall in a controlled manner I thought I would show how it's done with a regular CV MIG power source which can cost 500% less.



Pulsed Weld Procedures:

 

Once a sales organization brings pulsed to the weld shop floor, the following is what welders, QA personnel and robot technicians and programmers will have to deal with if pulsed weld adjustments are necessary. All of the following are required to make that simple carbon steel or stainless weld.

  • The pulsed welder asks. Where do I set the pulsed frequency?

  • The pulsed welder asks. Where do I set the pulsed width?

  • The pulsed welder asks. Where do I set the pulsed peak amps?

  • The pulsed welder asks. Where do I set the pulsed background current?

  • The pulsed welder asks. What pulsed amps or wire feed should I set?

  • The pulsed welder asks. What's a waver form?

  • The pulsed welder asks. If I change one of the pulsed parameters am I still following the companies pre-qualified weld procedure?

  • The pulsed welder asks. I don't set wire feed rates, I set amps, with this pulsed power source, how will I know how much weld I am depositing?

  • The pulsed welder asks. What's this trim voltage setting of 0 to 100 mean?

  • The pulsed welder asks. What do I do when the trim voltage setting has no effect on the arc length?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The pulsed weld drop is too large how do I make it smaller?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The pulsed arc is too intense how do I soften it?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The pulsed arc is too soft how do I increase the intensity?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The pulsed weld is too cold what should I change?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The pulsed weld is too hot what should I change?

  • The pulsed welder asks. Which pulsed parameter will increase or decrease weld penetration?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The pulsed is causing weld spatter how do I reduce the spatter?

  • The pulsed welder asks. For the same MIG application the pulsed parameters on the Swedish pulsed power source are different from the pulsed parameters from that Panasonic pulsed power source. How do we now comply with weld procedures? Do we have to change the weld procedures every time we bring new pulsed power source into the plant?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The pulsed weld is causing undercut which of the above parameters should we adjust?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The pulsed arc and weld are influenced by the mill scale on that new plate we just purchased, which of the above parameters should we adjust?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The robot pulsed weld start data is poor which of the above should we adjust?

  • The pulsed welder asks. The robot pulsed weld end data leaves the crater to concave, which of the above should we adjust?


    And the Lincoln rep replies to the pulsed MIG welder, guys it's simple if you understand ~~ "Wave Forms"~~






REMEMBER THAT SIMPLE, LOW COST,
DURABLE, TRADITIONAL MIG PROCESS?

  • Remember CV MIG, that simple weld process that has two basic welding controls,
    wire feed and voltage.

  • Remember CV MIG, that durable, low cost, MIG power source and wire feed control. That's the one stuck in the corner of your weld shop gathering dust. The same weld unit that lasted twenty years without maintenance. The power source that could be repaired by any third grade electrician.

  • Remember CV MIG. That process that provided two, practical, unique modes of weld transfer. One mode is the low amp, low voltage short circuit mode suited to all welds <0.100, and the other is the higher energy spray transfer mode suited to all welds > 0.100.

  • Remember CV MIG. After decades of use your welders and robot personnel still play around with those two simple controls. Well your weld manufacturing life can get a lot more complex, all you have to do is bring in a pulsed power source to your facility and you will understand how simple your other confused welding life was.

REMEMBER TRADITIONAL CV SHORT CIRCUIT (SC).

Both the pulsed mode and SC mode are ideal for manual welds on carbon steels and stainless, 20 gage to 2 mm.


There are power source that offer modified Short Circuit Transfer, such as Miller RMD, Fronius CMT. In contrast to the low cost SHORT CIRCUIT equipment, apart from all position welding of a pipe root pass these processes offer little for common MIG steel and stainless welding applications.


REMEMBER TRADITIONAL SPRAY TRANSFER (SP).

In contrast to the pulsed process, from traditional MIG equipment we also have the capability for a consistent, high energy weld mode, "Spray Transfer".


Spray transfer is a weld mode that welds in a typical current range of 200 - 400 amps.

Spray can weld in the flat, horizontal and vertical down weld position on steels < 3/16, (< 4.8 mm). Over 3/16 spray can be used on flat, horizontal and specific overhead applications.

Spray is the mode of weld transfer that I set on robots to weld the worlds largest Caterpillar trucks, John Deer tractors, Mercedes cars, Harley Bike frames and Volvo Trucks. This is the mode of weld transfer that allowed the big three auto companies to bring robot welding automation to their plants. For the last four decades, spray transfer has been the most successful process, the most widely used and the most abused weld process in all industrial nations.

The weld reality about spray. For five decades the spray transfer mode arc physics and weld application potential have rarely been appreciated or fully understood.


Thanks to frequent, ignorant sales information, and the general, global lack of MIG weld process control expertise, the often more inconsistent, more expensive pulsed equipment has displaced the spray transfer mode on many applications > 4 mm. The weld reality is spray transfer would have been better suited.



There are many in the weld industry
who fail tosee the obvious.




In a weld shop, life can be simple or life can be complex
.


Ninety Preprogrammed Pulsed Weld Schedules. You Have to be Kidding.


A MIG p
ulsed equipment benefit often touted by MIG equipment manufacturers and their sales force, is that their unique pulsed power source offers up to ninety weld schedules.

After forty years of making MIG equipment, the MIG equipment manufacturers are now proud to provide their weld customers with sophisticated pulsed MIG equipment that enables the weld decision maker a choice of up to "NINETY Preprogrammed Weld Schedules". What an incredible technology breakthrough, especially when you consider that ninety nine percent of all global MIG welds will require only "three feed and voltage settings".


WITH TRADITIONAL CV EQUIPMENT OR THE PULSED EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDED IN THIS SECTION, SIMPLY SELECT THE STEEL TYPE, WIRE SIZE AND USE THREE SETTINGS TO WELD ANYTHING IN YOUR SHOP.


THOSE SETTINGS ARE IN MY BOOKS AND CD TRAINING RESOURCES.




     

ED'S PULSED MIG REALITY.

I don't have a # 999 tattooed on the back of my neck. I am not anti-pulsed. I have successfully used pulsed MIG on some of North America's most difficult robot MIG applications.

  • I set pulsed MIG welds for the ABB Boiler / Power division. The application was Robot welds on all-position, boiler tubes to boiler header welds. This complex, 100% X-ray code weld application is traditionally carried out by the highest skilled, manual TIG welders. Using the robot, regular MIG short circuit would have been too cold and spray transfer too hot. I used pulsed MIG with unique process control data for the many weld tie ins. I attained an X-ray reject rate of < 1 percent.

  • I set and created a unique patent for pulsed for robot MIG welds on 622 - 625 nickel clad boiler tube walls, welding vertical down.

  • I set the robot pulsed MIG data for thin gage aluminum, welds on Club Car golf carts, an application which did not allow wire burn backs or weld burn through.

  • I used pulsed to robot weld aluminum bronze MIG wires welding thick copper to thin stainless.

    I am not anti pulsed, I am anti waste of money for a weld shop. I am also anti process confusion.



Fundamental Pulsed Parameters.

Typical Start Pulsed Data. Welding Carbon Steel MIG wires. Wire diameters 0.035 (1mm).
Wire
Feed ipm
Peak AmpsBG AmpsFreqWidth
350390 - 43060 - 85100 1401.9
420400 - 44560 - 90110- 1602
500420 - 46085 - 100140
185
2.1
600440 - 49085 - 100150
200
2.25
After a wire feed setting of 600 ipm, the 0.045 (1.2mm) wire should be utilized

Typical Start Pulsed Data for Carbon Steel MIG wires. Wire diameter 0.045 (1.2mm).
Wire
Feed ipm
Peak AmpsBG AmpsFreqWidth
280430 - 45580125
135
2.5
350460 - 48090150
165
2.65
420480 - 500100
105
155
190
2.75
500500 - 520105
120
190
230
2.85
After 420 ipm with the 0.045 wire, beware of high intensity, narrow plasma that may result, as poor weld penetration profiles and crater issues can result. A weld penetration that's deep and narrow could be subject to hot center weld cracks.

 

 

Typical Start Pulsed Data for Aluminum 5356 0.046 MIG wires (1.2 mm)
Wire
Feed ipm
Peak AmpsBG AmpsFreqWidth
280280 - 30060 - 70135
145
2 - 2.2
350300 - 31070 - 80160
170
2 - 2.2
420310 - 33080 - 90185
195
2.1 - 2.3
500340 - 36080 - 90200
220
2.2 - 2.4
Don't forget to cut the weld and check the weld penetration profile before using the parameters on your parts.

 

 

Typical Start Pulsed Data for Aluminum 5356 0.062 MIG wires (1.6mm)
wire
feed ipm
Peak ampsBG ampsFreqWidth
150325 - 34065 - 7565
75
1.7 - 2
220345 - 355100 - 120105
115
1.7 - 2
260 355 - 370125 - 135125
135
1.8 - 2
330380 - 390155 - 170

140
150

1.8 - 2


Don't forget to cut the weld and check the weld penetration profiles before using the weld parameters on your parts. Look at that pulsed weld droplet, view the size the frequency of the droplet detachment and the arc length to see if pulsed parameter adjustments are necessary. On parts over 3 mm you may like the weld penetration profiles attained from traditional spray.

 




IT'S YOUR CHOICE, ONE SMALL PRICE FOR PROCESS
KNOWLEDGE, OR ONE GIANT PRICE FOR WELD REWORK.


     


Lets see for manual and robot welding my carbon steel and stainless parts I have a choice of regular MIG or the new pulsed power source that Fred the local welding salesmen is promoting. The following is what I have to consider.

  • Do I need to develop new pulsed procedures for a weld application that more than likely has been successfully MIG welding for decades?

  • Do I need more process complexity and issues in the welding department?

  • Do I need electronic equipment that costs more and cannot be repaired by our maintenance department?

I do have a family and a home I like to see, that is when I am not working here 60 hours a week. I think I will go with the regular MIG mode. I can get Ed's process training materials to optimize the process. Hey if traditional MIG has been good enough for Caterpillar, Mercedes and Volvo for the last few decades it's good enough for me.


While most companies invest thousands and sometimes millions of dollars on robot lines and welding equipment, consider that for a few dollars the personnel involved will be able to optimize that equipment.



Every weld decision maker who uses or is involved with either manual or robot MIG and Pulsed MIG should consider Ed's MIG Process Control Training resources.

Who Benefits: Welders. Weld Supervisor and Mgrs. Weld Part / Fixture Designers. QA personnel. Engineers responsible for robots. Robot Programmers, Robot Operators Robot Maintenance Personnel.

 

Finally for that individual who has to manage more than the process, for the individual who wants "all the knowledge required to make rational welding decisions in RUNNING A WELDING DEPARTMENT, check out my 600 page "Management Engineer MIG book, a book referred to by some engineers as the "MIG bible". Follow this link.

 

E Mail From Larry in Ireland.

Hi Ed, If I only knew 1% of your knowledge I would be content in my profession. I use the Lincoin STT for welding 2- 10 mm stainless applications using a special Helium tri-gas mix, Stainshield Light gas from BOC. I need another machine but this equipment in Ireland cost €14000 ($28000) any suggestions?

Ed's Answer:
Larry, consider the Miller 350 P with argon 2- 5% CO2, this power source and low cost gas will do all your welds. The power source in the US cost approx. $5000 and forget the helium tri mix use the two component gas mix I developed, (MIG gas section).

 



This is what can happen when the pulsed MIG welds fail on an axle.

Keep smiling. Remember your mother did not want
you to go into the welding profession.